On 5/14/20 2:59 PM, Vascom wrote:
Yes, after system installed on hard drive the same error.
But after upgrading boost* error is gone and packages normal installed.
I can verify this. I wonder if it could be considered a bug in dnf or
the solver. The problem seems to be about having an update
* boost-1.69.0-18.fc32, obsoleting boost169 on Fedora 32:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8770cfebcd
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Co
On 5/14/20 2:59 PM, Vascom wrote:
Yes, after system installed on hard drive the same error.
But after upgrading boost* error is gone and packages normal installed.
Maybe that's why I don't see it. I do net installs which include
updates. So as long as someone does updates before trying to in
Yes, after system installed on hard drive the same error.
But after upgrading boost* error is gone and packages normal installed.
пт, 15 мая 2020 г. в 00:33, Vascom :
>
> I just could reproduce it.
>
> Steps:
> 1. Run KDE spin F32 in virt-manager.
> 2. dnf install toolnix
>
> Result:
>
> mkvtooln
I just could reproduce it.
Steps:
1. Run KDE spin F32 in virt-manager.
2. dnf install toolnix
Result:
mkvtoolnix x86_64 46.0.0-1.fc32 updates 5.2 M
Installing dependencies:
boost169-filesystem x86_64 1.69.0-6.fc32 fedora53 k
boost169-syste
On Thu, 14 May 2020 20:08:07 -
"Denis Arnaud" wrote:
> > No one try to install it now. New boost will be in F33 only.
> >
> > But if boost not installed in system and user want install for
> > example libreoffice he will get this error and can't install any
> > package requires boost.
> >
>
Hm, now work.
But it was...
чт, 14 мая 2020 г. в 23:56, Samuel Sieb :
>
> On 5/14/20 1:34 PM, Denis Arnaud wrote:
> > So, should I add the obsoletes clauses for every package, or is it fine to
> > leave it as it is now?
>
> I believe it's fine to just leave it as it is. I did a couple of
> insta
On 5/14/20 1:34 PM, Denis Arnaud wrote:
So, should I add the obsoletes clauses for every package, or is it fine to
leave it as it is now?
I believe it's fine to just leave it as it is. I did a couple of
installs and tested installing applications and it only brings in the
regular boost pack
So, should I add the obsoletes clauses for every package, or is it fine to
leave it as it is now?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https:/
On 5/14/20 12:22 PM, Vascom wrote:
No one try to install it now. New boost will be in F33 only.
But if boost not installed in system and user want install for example
libreoffice he will get this error and can't install any package
requires boost.
No, you won't get that error. dnf will pick o
> No one try to install it now. New boost will be in F33 only.
>
> But if boost not installed in system and user want install for example
> libreoffice he will get this error and can't install any package
> requires boost.
>
> boost169 must be removed from F32 repos at all.
>
> чт, 14 мая 2020 г
> No one try to install it now. New boost will be in F33 only.
>
> But if boost not installed in system and user want install for example
> libreoffice he will get this error and can't install any package
> requires boost.
>
> boost169 must be removed from F32 repos at all.
>
> чт, 14 мая 2020 г
No one try to install it now. New boost will be in F33 only.
But if boost not installed in system and user want install for example
libreoffice he will get this error and can't install any package
requires boost.
boost169 must be removed from F32 repos at all.
чт, 14 мая 2020 г. в 22:19, Samuel
On 5/14/20 10:49 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
The boost169 compatibility package conflicts with the regular boost on
Fedora 32. Both packages provides the same libraries.
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib64/libboost_system.so.1.69.0 from install of
boost169-system-1.69.0-6.f
Hello all!
The boost169 compatibility package conflicts with the regular boost on
Fedora 32. Both packages provides the same libraries.
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib64/libboost_system.so.1.69.0 from install of
boost169-system-1.69.0-6.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
15 matches
Mail list logo
