Current status update for MATE.
1. Creating an applet for using gnome-bluetooth inside MATE is a death project
for me.
The applet himself is working (thanks kalev), but using gnome-blutooth
properties is a problem since 'properties' isn't a standalone application
anymore and moved to control-ce
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:03:17AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
>
> > Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major desktop
> > environments supports bluetooth in a stable fashion? That seems kind of
> > like a
>
project.org:
>
> > Message: 13
> > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:03:20 +0200
> > From: Kalev Lember
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Subject: Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.
> > Message-ID: <520969b8.1030...@gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plai
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:48:46PM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Instead of shipping it, is there a problem with giving it to those on
> the developer list and letting us iron out the kinks?
Sure, that's what already happens. If you want to help, this thread
contains a multitude of pointers wher
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 08:55:01AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Have you tried Bluetooth on our major desktop environments in F19? :P
>
> (I kid, I kid, it mostly works well. But still, I have to pair my mouse
> every damn time I want to use it, for instance.)
Oh, is https://bugzilla.redhat.
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 14:28 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> It sounds like BlueZ5 is not ready for Fedora, betwen the "early alpha" XFCE
> code, and shipping git BlueDevil, mate and cinnamon don't appear to work with
> it ...
We're not even at Alpha TC1 yet, remember. It's not unusual for stuff
roadm
On 19/08/2013 4:31 PM, "Richard Vickery"
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Garrett
wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> >
> >> Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major
desktop
> >> environments supports bluetooth in a s
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
>
>> Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major desktop
>> environments supports bluetooth in a stable fashion? That seems kind of like
>> a
>> disaster wait
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
> Basically we ship Fedora 20 in a state where one only of our major desktop
> environments supports bluetooth in a stable fashion? That seems kind of like
> a
> disaster waiting to happen.
The current release blocking desktops are Gnom
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Ryan Rix wrote:
> On Sun 18 August 2013 10:00:22 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:40:54 +0200
>>
>> Rave it wrote:
>> > I don't see that adding a bluetooth-panel-applet package is easy for
>> > mate/xfce/lxde. First tests shows me that the removed pan
On Sun 18 August 2013 10:00:22 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:40:54 +0200
>
> Rave it wrote:
> > I don't see that adding a bluetooth-panel-applet package is easy for
> > mate/xfce/lxde. First tests shows me that the removed panel code from
> > gnome-bluetooth isn't independent from t
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:40:54 +0200
Rave it wrote:
> I don't see that adding a bluetooth-panel-applet package is easy for
> mate/xfce/lxde. First tests shows me that the removed panel code from
> gnome-bluetooth isn't independent from the the rest of the code. I
> quess for this reason the gnome d
On 08/17/2013 01:47 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Will the bluez-compat be killed in this move?
Yes, already gone in the rawhide package:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bluez.git/commit/?id=e321c716dddf55724776b8686de01cd7f45cbc4a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754523
--
:19:27
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 15:10 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM,
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 15:10 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> >>> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth
On 08/13/2013 09:44 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 08/13/2013 02:28 PM, Rave it wrote:
Other probs are:
1. gnome-bluetooth upstream has removed the fallback icon for autostart in
session,...no systray icon in other DE than gnome itself.
2. if gnome revert this change in upstream 'OnlyShowIn=MAT
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 15:04 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> >> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
> >> point in time.
> >
> > Reforking? And then wa
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>>> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
>>> point in time.
>>
>> Reforking? And then wait unt
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
>> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
>> point in time.
>
> Reforking? And then wait until the bitrot sets in again? ;-)
>
> Can't you just use gno
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:37:19PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Otherwise we are looking at possibly reforking gnome-bluetooth at this
> point in time.
Reforking? And then wait until the bitrot sets in again? ;-)
Can't you just use gnome-bluetooth proper and resurrect the panel icon
stuff like Kale
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 08/13/2013 02:28 PM, Rave it wrote:
>> Other probs are:
>> 1. gnome-bluetooth upstream has removed the fallback icon for autostart in
>> session,...no systray icon in other DE than gnome itself.
>> 2. if gnome revert this change in ups
Am Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:59:15 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> - Original Message -
> > On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20
> >
> > I have been coordinating with various peop
On 08/13/2013 08:06 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> The page looks good, thanks for coordination. Just could you please extend
> the scope with resolution for mate bt? Also for contingency plan, I'd like
> to see a real deadline - Beta as a point to revert things as a coordination
> would be needed. O
- Original Message -
> On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20
>
> I have been coordinating with various people and looks like all teams
> are go. NetworkManager and PulseAudio changes are slightly lagging
- Original Message -
> On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20
>
> I have been coordinating with various people and looks like all teams
> are go. NetworkManager and PulseAudio changes are slightly lagging
On 08/13/2013 02:28 PM, Rave it wrote:
> Other probs are:
> 1. gnome-bluetooth upstream has removed the fallback icon for autostart in
> session,...no systray icon in other DE than gnome itself.
> 2. if gnome revert this change in upstream 'OnlyShowIn=MATE" needs to be
> added.
> 3. Also runt
Am Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:00:01 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:26:05 +0200
> From: Kalev Lember
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>
> Subject: Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.
> Message-ID: <
On 08/13/2013 11:11 AM, Rave it wrote:
> mate-bluetooth doesn't support bluez5, and upstream doesn't have started to
> port it.
> I don't expect that is is ready before f20 alpha or beata.
> So it would be very nice not to push bluez5 into f20.
> Also Cristofph Wickert asked me to clean up runtime
Am Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:34:53 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> Message: 13
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:03:20 +0200
> From: Kalev Lember
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.
> Message-ID: <520969b8.1030...@gmail.com&
On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20
I have been coordinating with various people and looks like all teams
are go. NetworkManager and PulseAudio changes are slightly lagging
behind, but it's probably best if we mo
- Original Message -
> On 08/01/2013 07:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I was kind of expecting this would have landed by now though, Bastien
> > will be @ GUADEC this week so not sure if he'll respond quickly
>
> We'll discuss this at GUADEC and I'll follow up here once we figure out
> a
On 08/01/2013 07:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I was kind of expecting this would have landed by now though, Bastien
will be @ GUADEC this week so not sure if he'll respond quickly
We'll discuss this at GUADEC and I'll follow up here once we figure out
a plan what to do.
It's possible that it
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 18:36 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
> >> What exactly is holding the Updates back in Fedora?
> >> Is there a reason for excluding the 5.x Series?
> >
> >
> >
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
>> What exactly is holding the Updates back in Fedora?
>> Is there a reason for excluding the 5.x Series?
>
>
> See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bluez5
> and the thread st
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
> What exactly is holding the Updates back in Fedora?
> Is there a reason for excluding the 5.x Series?
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bluez5
and the thread starting at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013
Hey Guy.
Is there something wrong with BlueZ 5.x Series?
The Website states that using the 4.x Version is deprecated.
What exactly is holding the Updates back in Fedora?
Is there a reason for excluding the 5.x Series?
--
Stefan HeldVI has only 2 Modes:
obi unixkiste org
36 matches
Mail list logo
