> Is it the meeting itself which you find helpful or the discussion and
> information during the review meetings? Could you see asynchronous
> conversation (exact method TBD) being as useful?
The discussion is very helpful. It can be asynchronous, of course. It won't be
as efficient, but that's a
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 12:10 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
>
> >
> > I think the best evidence of this is the number of bugs which get
> > proposed as blockers or NTH without any justification of why or citing
> > of any release criterion that might be
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 08:22:12 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Affected Voters:
> > - Do you vote on blocker status in bug comments?
>
> If necessary, but I don't like it much. In my experience the
> discussion in the meeting is often very helpful to understand the
> nature of the bug, and it c
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
>
> I think the best evidence of this is the number of bugs which get
> proposed as blockers or NTH without any justification of why or citing
> of any release criterion that might be violated. I take that as "the
> process isn't being communicated
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:34:12 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Anyhow, helpful thoughts would be appreciated. Hopefully we can
> > improve the process so that it's less painful for everyone and
> > maybe even more useful (at the very least, less difficult to
> > understand).
>
> I don't want to
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 08:22 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Affected Voters:
> > - Do you vote on blocker status in bug comments?
>
> If necessary, but I don't like it much. In my experience the
> discussion in the meeting is often very helpful to understand the
> nature of the bug, and it can shif
> Affected Voters:
> - Do you vote on blocker status in bug comments?
If necessary, but I don't like it much. In my experience the discussion in the
meeting is often very helpful to understand the nature of the bug, and it can
shift my opinion substantially.
Also I don't like spamming bugzilla
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 15:19 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> I don't think that anyone is a huge fan of the current blocker bug
> process. I realize that the people most affected by the process are
> really busy right now but I also think that it wouldn't be a bad thing
> to start a conversation while the
I don't think that anyone is a huge fan of the current blocker bug
process. I realize that the people most affected by the process are
really busy right now but I also think that it wouldn't be a bad thing
to start a conversation while the process is active and at its most
painful. I don't really w
