On 28 January 2010 22:58, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Steve Dickson writes:
>
>> I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
>>
>> I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
>> when you push something out that breaks existing configurations, its crap!
>
> If you need
Adam Williamson wrote:
> There was a clear failure in this process, though, which was that the
> update was sent straight to updates and did not go through
> updates-testing. I can't see any reason why that should be acceptable
> for an update to a very popular package which manipulates data that
Sorry for my delayed response...
On 01/28/2010 05:58 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Steve Dickson writes:
>
>> I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
>>
>> I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
>> when you push something out that breaks existing configur
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 19:04 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Jesse Keating writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:58 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >> Steve Dickson writes:
> >>
> >> > I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
> >> >
> >> > I have been on both sides of these bugs... S
Jesse Keating writes:
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:58 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Steve Dickson writes:
> I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
>
> I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
> when you push something out that breaks existing configuration
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:58 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Steve Dickson writes:
>
> > I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
> >
> > I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
> > when you push something out that breaks existing configurations, its crap!
Steve Dickson writes:
I guess I have a different definition of crap... ;-)
I have been on both sides of these bugs... So I know (the hard way)
when you push something out that breaks existing configurations, its crap!
If you need to run stable software, Fedora is not the right distro for you
Steve Dickson on 01/28/2010 09:44 AM wrote:
> What is CONDSTORE support and will I have to turn it back on
> once the problem has been resolved?
According to the RFC[1], it allows more efficient multi-client access
support to an IMAP server. Disabling CONDSTORE will result in more
bandwidth usag
On 01/28/2010 10:24 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Michal Schmidt on 01/28/2010 09:15 AM wrote:
>> This happened today to a colleague of mine. I suggested him to remove
>> ~/.thunderbird/*.default/ImapMail/*/*.msf which fixed the problem (it
>> made Thunderbird reload the state of the emails fr
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> You (should) get the same effect from right-clicking on a mail folder
> and selecting "Rebuild Index".
s/selecting/selecting properties, then/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Michal Schmidt on 01/28/2010 09:15 AM wrote:
> This happened today to a colleague of mine. I suggested him to remove
> ~/.thunderbird/*.default/ImapMail/*/*.msf which fixed the problem (it
> made Thunderbird reload the state of the emails from the IMAP server
> again).
You (should) get the same ef
Dne 28.1.2010 15:53, Steve Dickson napsal(a):
>>> BEWARE!
>>>
>>> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
Everybody take a look at this bug (now CLOSED/UPSTREAM) for temporary
workaround.
Matěj
--
http://www.
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:17:57 -0500 Steve Dickson wrote:
> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as
> new) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
This happened today to a colleague of mine. I suggested him to remove
~/.thunderbird/*.default/ImapMail/*/*.msf whi
On 01/28/2010 08:58 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
> Dne 28.1.2010 14:17, Steve Dickson napsal(a):
>> BEWARE!
>>
>> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>>
>> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, a
On 01/28/2010 08:29 AM, Alex Hudson wrote:
> I don't usually throw in my 2p on subjective issues like this, but...
>
> On 28/01/10 13:17, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Most of us really take pride in making sure what we push out to
>> the community has been tested and will not be disruptive
>> or dest
Mike McGrath on 01/28/2010 08:45 AM wrote:
> This one's tricky, what checks could have been in place to prevent this?
> Additional testing may not have worked as some people say they aren't
> seeing the issue.
It (should) be only IMAP users who are affected. Not every TB user is
using IMAP. I see
On 01/28/2010 09:45 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>> BEWARE!
>>
>> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>>
>> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all ta
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Steve Dickson wrote:
> BEWARE!
>
> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>
> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
> been completely destroyed. DO NOT upgrade to
On 28/01/10 13:17, Steve Dickson wrote:
> BEWARE!
>
> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>
> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
> been completely destroyed. DO NOT upgrade to ver
Dne 28.1.2010 14:17, Steve Dickson napsal(a):
> BEWARE!
>
> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>
> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
> been completely destroyed. DO NOT upgrade
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Alex Hudson wrote:
>
> I think it's a bit unfair to assume less than good faith on the part of
> other developers.
Amen... I too use Thunderbird daily (including 3.0.1) and I have not
seen these issues either. Although it does appear that the update
bypassed upd
I don't usually throw in my 2p on subjective issues like this, but...
On 28/01/10 13:17, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Most of us really take pride in making sure what we push out to
> the community has been tested and will not be disruptive
> or destructive. Then there a small group of people that simpl
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> BEWARE!
>
> [Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
>
> For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
> been completely destroyed. DO
BEWARE!
[Bug 559312] thunderbird corrupts mail indices (Old mail marked as new)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559312
For the last 24hrs all my mail state (read/unread, all tags) have
been completely destroyed. DO NOT upgrade to version 3.0.1!!!
Most of us really take pride in makin
24 matches
Mail list logo
