On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 18:31:14 GMT, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 00:35:43 -0800,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>systemd was in TC9, so you can upkarma based on TC9 testing. The texlive
>>update is a blocker only for reasons of taking up lots of space on the
>>DVD - normal t
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:01:37 -0800,
Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, the key question is 'is this update at least better than the last
one'. Though of course if there are still significant remaining
problems, please do bring them to the attention of the maintainer...
None of that is new, so
On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 12:31 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 00:35:43 -0800,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >systemd was in TC9, so you can upkarma based on TC9 testing. The texlive
> >update is a blocker only for reasons of taking up lots of space on the
> >DVD - normal
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 00:35:43 -0800,
Adam Williamson wrote:
systemd was in TC9, so you can upkarma based on TC9 testing. The texlive
update is a blocker only for reasons of taking up lots of space on the
DVD - normal testing that it still works, deps are sane etc should be
all it needs.
Here's a quick update on current Beta status.
We need karma on two blocker-fixing builds:
* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18353/systemd-195-7.fc18
*
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18380/texlive-2012-8.20121115_r28267.fc18
systemd was in TC9, so you can
