Re: Basic package split question

2017-12-02 Thread Philip Kovacs
>> You need to add Obsoletes: foo < 2 >Sorry, hit send too early. You need to add such obsoletes BOTH to foo and foo- >bar. Adding obsoletes foo < 2 on both packages worked.  Thanks much. On Saturday, December 2, 2017 4:28 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Has

Re: Basic package split question

2017-12-02 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 10:25 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 09:24 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: > > Il 01/12/2017 20:20, Philip Kovacs ha scritto: > > > If I have version 1 of package foo, containing items bar, xxx, yyy, > > > zzz,

Re: Basic package split question

2017-12-02 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 09:24 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 01/12/2017 20:20, Philip Kovacs ha scritto: > > If I have version 1 of package foo, containing items bar, xxx, yyy, > > zzz, i.e. > > > > foo-1 > > - > > bar > > xxx > > yyy > > zzz >

Re: Basic package split question

2017-12-02 Thread Mattia Verga
Il 01/12/2017 20:20, Philip Kovacs ha scritto: If I have version 1 of package foo, containing items bar, xxx, yyy, zzz, i.e. foo-1 - bar xxx yyy zzz and, for version 2, bar is split off to its own sub-package, foo-bar, so that the desired packaging becomes: foo-2  foo-bar-2 -  -

Basic package split question

2017-12-01 Thread Philip Kovacs
If I have version 1 of package foo, containing items bar, xxx, yyy, zzz, i.e. foo-1-barxxxyyyzzz and, for version 2, bar is split off to its own sub-package, foo-bar, so that  the desired packaging becomes: foo-2         foo-bar-2-         -xxx           baryyyzzz with foo-bar perma