On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:03:52 -0600
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:03:52 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still
> interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, hav
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 15:18:30 -0400
Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 13:03 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are sti
On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 13:03 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so, have
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS). If they're not int
