On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:57:29 -0400
Andy Grimm wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2014 5:28 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
...snip...
> > * sadmac - former email address cdah...@redhat.com
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/sadmac/
> > Point of contact: 1
> > Co-maintainer:0
> >
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:42:10 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 18:41 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > * ssp - former email address sandm...@redhat.com
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/ssp/
> > >
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 18:41 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > * ssp - former email address sandm...@redhat.com
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/ssp/
> > Point of contact: 39
> > Co-maintainer:254
> > Watched: 0
>
On Jun 18, 2014 5:28 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
>
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
> maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
> maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
> maintaining their packages (and if so, have th
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:57:08 + (UTC)
Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2014-06-18, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * tgraf - former email address tg...@redhat.com
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/tgraf/
>
> He uses now. It's in his FAS account listed. His
> latest post on netdev mailing li
On 2014-06-18, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * tgraf - former email address tg...@redhat.com
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/tgraf/
He uses now. It's in his FAS account listed. His latest
post on netdev mailing list was on 2014-06-04, 14 days ago.
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 15:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * ssp - former email address sandm...@redhat.com
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/ssp/
> Point of contact: 39
> Co-maintainer: 254
> Watched:0
We're reshuffling Søren's packages (in a RHEL ownership sense)
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS). If they're not
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:57:24PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:11:47AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
> > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer
> > policy t
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:11:47AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
> maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer
> policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their
> packages (an
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:30:27PM +0200, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
>
> If you don't find any contact for llim, feel free to reassign redhat-lsb
> to me - I'm monitoring the bugzillas of redhat-lsb package anyway and
> I'm the owner in RHEL. We discussed with Lawrence transfer even in
> Fedora, but it n
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 10:11 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
> maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer
> policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their
> packages (and if so
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer
policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their
packages (and if so, have them update their email addresses in FAS). If
they're not
13 matches
Mail list logo
