On 26 September 2015 at 15:16, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> IIUC, it is necessary to *move* the file to /usr/share/icons, and then
> either update the code to load the icon from there, or symlink from
> /usr/share/postbooks/images/ to /usr/share/icons. Updating the code
> would of course b
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 03:34:39PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 26/09/15 15:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 11:14:45AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> >> On 24 September 2015 at 19:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:28
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 11:14:45AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 24 September 2015 at 19:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:28:44AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> >> postbooks: specified icon '/usr/share/postbooks/images/icon128x32.png'
> >> does not exist
On 24 September 2015 at 19:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:28:44AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> postbooks: specified icon '/usr/share/postbooks/images/icon128x32.png'
>> does not exist
> The png is in the rpm... What's going on here?
It's not in a standard s
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:28:44AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> postbooks: specified icon '/usr/share/postbooks/images/icon128x32.png'
> does not exist
The png is in the rpm... What's going on here?
Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 15:15:16 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> With a bit of gimp'ing, isn't the one on the top right of
> http://www.uzbl.org/ good enough to install? That looks a lot like
> 64x64.
Actually, keis pointed me to an SVG that had already been made:
https://github.com/uzbl/uzbl-
On 20 September 2015 at 15:50, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Is this something any app with a too-small icon (or without, I suppose)
> can do? For example, uzbl has an icon, but I have no source to make a
> scaled up one (and contacting the original author has gotten nothing).
With a bit of gimp'ing, isn'
On Fri, 18 Sep, 2015 at 13:14:31 GMT, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Perhaps you could ask one of the designers in
> #gnome-design to come up with something that looks awesome.
Is this something any app with a too-small icon (or without, I suppose)
can do? For example, uzbl has an icon, but I have no sou
On 18 September 2015 at 13:46, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Does this mean that only flarq isn't showing up? It's packaged with Fldigi
> so as along as it's showing up I'm not too concerned.
There doesn't appear to be any AppData file for fldigi so it's not
going to show up at all in the software center
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> fldigi: Uses XPM icon: flarq
>
Does this mean that only flarq isn't showing up? It's packaged with Fldigi
so as along as it's showing up I'm not too concerned.
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
The following applications are missing from the software center in F23
beta, although they *are* shipping an AppData file (which seems to
suggest they wanted to be shown):
albumart: No 'Comment' in desktop or in AppData
albumart: No 'Name' in desktop or in AppData
asylum: icon /usr/share/icons/h
11 matches
Mail list logo
