FYI, I'm still planning on working on the Java packaging issues. But, still
working on figuring out how to do the work. I've had a lot of other problems
come up lately so I have not made too much progress. But, I still expect to be
working on this soon.
On Wednesday, February 5, 2020, 9:11
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:55 PM Mario Torre wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:41 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > > Currently impossible due to completely broken Java stack in Fedora.
> > >
> > > When I read this I'm always puzzled by the negativity.
> > >
> > > What is "completely broken" exactl
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:41 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > Currently impossible due to completely broken Java stack in Fedora.
> >
> > When I read this I'm always puzzled by the negativity.
> >
> > What is "completely broken" exactly that you need? Things seem to work
> > quite well.
>
> The prob
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mario Torre wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:22 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 05.02.2020 05:05, Code Zombie wrote:
> > > Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does anyone already
> > > plan to maintain it or can I take it over?
(snip
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:22 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 05.02.2020 05:05, Code Zombie wrote:
> > Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does anyone already
> > plan to maintain it or can I take it over?
>
> Currently impossible due to completely broken Java stack in Fedora.
On 05.02.2020 10:11, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> We (Eclipse maintainers in Fedora) are looking into using Flatpak
> instead (https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.eclipse.Java)
Then start building Fedora native flatpaks. Flatpak != Flathub. Flathub
is a third-party repository.
--
Sincerely,
V
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 12:01 PM Code Zombie wrote:
> The flatpak packages seem huge in size (at least that's what is shown in
> the Gnome Software application).
>
Size of an rpm may look small(ish) but that's thanks to much from the
overall size being moved in other RPMs it depends on. Also if y
> Currently at its version 11.2, Apache NetBeans is a great piece of
> development software. Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages?
> Does
> anyone already plan to maintain it or can I take it over?
On the fedora docs they said to use the executable
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NetBea
The flatpak packages seem huge in size (at least that's what is shown in
the Gnome Software application). Also, for one, Flatpak version of Eclipse
does not support built-in support.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:12 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:07 AM Code Zombie
> wro
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:07 AM Code Zombie wrote:
> Currently at its version 11.2, Apache NetBeans is a great piece of
> development software. Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does
> anyone already plan to maintain it or can I take it over?
>
We (Eclipse maintainers in Fedora) ar
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 10:03, Code Zombie wrote:
>
> What do you mean? The source code built successfully on my Fedora 31 system
> with JDK 11 (using ant).
The point is that Java apps usually contain many bundled libraries
that need to be unbundled and packaged independently. Given the
current st
Am 05.02.20 um 09:55 schrieb Code Zombie:
> What do you mean? The source code built successfully on my Fedora 31 system
> with JDK 11 (using ant).
I don't know the Netbeans code but in Fedora we need to build each package
from source (no precompiled jars). That means we also need to ship *all*
de
What do you mean? The source code built successfully on my Fedora 31 system
with JDK 11 (using ant).
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:22 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 05.02.2020 05:05, Code Zombie wrote:
> > Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does
El mié., 5 feb. 2020 9:28, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> escribió:
> On 05.02.2020 05:05, Code Zombie wrote:
> > Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does anyone already
> > plan to maintain it or can I take it over?
>
> Currently impossible due to completel
On 05.02.2020 05:05, Code Zombie wrote:
> Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does anyone already
> plan to maintain it or can I take it over?
Currently impossible due to completely broken Java stack in Fedora.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
Currently at its version 11.2, Apache NetBeans is a great piece of
development software. Is Fedora considering to add it to its packages? Does
anyone already plan to maintain it or can I take it over?
- Mehdi
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
16 matches
Mail list logo
