Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 19/07/2024 15:25, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I guess we need to investigate why this didn't work in this situation. The absence of the fmtX compatibility package in the buildroot makes it impossible to rebuild dnf5. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) --

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:37 PM kefu chai wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 2:22 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:51 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel >> wrote: >> > >> > On 18/07/2024 08:27, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > > I guess the fmt10 compat package needs to be imp

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 2:22 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:51 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > > > On 18/07/2024 08:27, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I guess the fmt10 compat package needs to be imported to ELN (or > > > everything patched/rebuilt to so.11). > >

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:51 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 18/07/2024 08:27, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I guess the fmt10 compat package needs to be imported to ELN (or > > everything patched/rebuilt to so.11). > > You're right, a compatibility version is required to unbreak Koji/dnf5

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 18/07/2024 08:27, Adam Williamson wrote: I guess the fmt10 compat package needs to be imported to ELN (or everything patched/rebuilt to so.11). You're right, a compatibility version is required to unbreak Koji/dnf5 there, but Fedora maintainers can't do anything with it since ELN is a sepa

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 18/07/2024 08:27, Adam Williamson wrote: I guess the fmt10 compat package needs to be imported to ELN (or everything patched/rebuilt to so.11). dnf5 builds without issues against version 11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2490335 Someone should just trigger an ELN reb

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 18/07/2024 07:58, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: This broke dnf5 in ELN: fmt-11.0.1-2.eln141 is in ELN. After rebuilding dnf5 by mass rebuild, it should be fixed automatically. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) -- ___ devel mail

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 07:58 +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > This broke dnf5 in ELN: > nothing provides libfmt.so.10()(64bit) needed by > libdnf5-plugin-actions-5.2.4.0-1.eln141.x86_64 from ELN-Extras > > Not sure where to report such ELN issues to, so, please, dispatch accordingly. I guess the

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

This broke dnf5 in ELN: nothing provides libfmt.so.10()(64bit) needed by libdnf5-plugin-actions-5.2.4.0-1.eln141.x86_64 from ELN-Extras Not sure where to report such ELN issues to, so, please, dispatch accordingly. On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 9:36 AM kefu chai wrote: > > Hi folks, > > fmt 11.0.1 upd

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 03:36:22PM +0800, kefu chai wrote: > Hi folks, > > fmt 11.0.1 update will include soversion bump from .10 to .11. > > All dependent packages must be rebuilt in Rawhide. > > I've built the compatibility package of fmt10 and the regular fmt 11 > packages in the side tag of

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, 2024-07-16 at 20:51 +0800, kefu chai wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 5:48 PM Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:19 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < > > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > I've rebuilt some important dependent packages (spdlo

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 5:48 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:19 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> I've rebuilt some important dependent packages (spdlog) in this side >> tag, so technically we can merge this side tag today be

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 11:19 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I've rebuilt some important dependent packages (spdlog) in this side > tag, so technically we can merge this side tag today before the mass > rebuild starts. > Yeah, you're right, missing that woul

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 16/07/2024 11:10, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: At this point, I'd probably say go ahead and build a new fmt 11 and fmt 10 compat in rawhide proper. There is a mass rebuild starting tomorrow which will take care of the rebuilds, and since you've introduced the compat package, there is no much h

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Hello Kefu, At this point, I'd probably say go ahead and build a new fmt 11 and fmt 10 compat in rawhide proper. There is a mass rebuild starting tomorrow which will take care of the rebuilds, and since you've introduced the compat package, there is no much harm this can cause. On Tue, Jul 16, 20

Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Hi folks, fmt 11.0.1 update will include soversion bump from .10 to .11. All dependent packages must be rebuilt in Rawhide. I've built the compatibility package of fmt10 and the regular fmt 11 packages in the side tag of f41-build-side-92475. following packages need to be rebuilt: 0ad arbor be

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 07:42:39AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > The side tag has been merged: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4e8e736635 > > FTBFS (final): > > arbor (not related to fmt, some tests failed on s390x) > CuraEngine > bout++ > cachelib > dolphin-emu >

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 12:37, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 30/06/2023 10:01, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > As it is, you're forcing the above maintainers to > > scramble to fix their packages at the beginning of summer holiday > > season. > > Announced: 23.05.2023. > Rebuil

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 30/06/2023 10:01, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: As it is, you're forcing the above maintainers to scramble to fix their packages at the beginning of summer holiday season. Announced: 23.05.2023. Rebuild started: 27.06.2023. FTBFS packages announced: 28.06.2023. Side tag merged: 30.06

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Vitaly, On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 07:42, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > The side tag has been merged: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4e8e736635 > > FTBFS (final): > > arbor (not related to fmt, some tests failed on s390x) > CuraEngine > bout++ > cachelib > dolphin-emu

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

The side tag has been merged: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4e8e736635 FTBFS (final): arbor (not related to fmt, some tests failed on s390x) CuraEngine bout++ cachelib dolphin-emu folly mangohud (not related to fmt) wasmedge watchman FTI issues will be generated automatica

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Dne 28. 06. 23 v 23:39 Kalev Lember napsal(a): On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 8:03 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: FTBFS: 0ad arbor CuraEngine bout++ cachelib dolphin-emu folly freeopcua gerbera luxcorerender mangohud wasmedge watchman I

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 28/06/2023 23:39, Kalev Lember wrote: Why? Now that you've already done all the work of adding the compatibility package, why drop it and break all of the unbuilt packages in rawhide? I don't think any of the packages from the list are release blocking, but it just seems antisocial for rawhi

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 8:03 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > FTBFS: > > 0ad > arbor > CuraEngine > bout++ > cachelib > dolphin-emu > folly > freeopcua > gerbera > luxcorerender > mangohud > wasmedge > watchman > I fixed 0ad from that list and built it in the

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

FTBFS: 0ad arbor CuraEngine bout++ cachelib dolphin-emu folly freeopcua gerbera luxcorerender mangohud wasmedge watchman I think I will merge this side tag without fmt9 compatibility package tomorrow. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) _

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Richard Shaw wrote on 2023/06/28 23:40: On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:37 AM Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:12 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed. gnuradio Issue filed upstream: https://github.com/gnuradio

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:37 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:12 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed. >> >> gnuradio >> > > Issue filed upstream: > https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/issues/6735 >

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

> FTBFS: > contour-terminal Applying the related upstream commit as the patch, the rebuild succeeded. Ref: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102707247 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 28/06/2023 15:00, Aleksei Bavshin wrote: Known regression in fmt. Please, apply https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/pull/3430. Thanks for the information. The fix has been ported to fmt-10.0.0-2.fc39. waybar is now fixed. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

> FTBFS: > easyrpg-player Upstream has already updated the program to work with fmt10, so I just applied the relevant commit to the Fedora package. Submitted and rebuilt: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=102705429 A.FI. ___ devel mai

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 6/28/23 04:10, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed. FTBFS: waybar Known regression in fmt. Please, apply https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/pull/3430. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 28/06/2023 14:10, Kalev Lember wrote: Since you already have the compat package, I would suggest merging the side tag as is. I'm waiting for dnf5: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/675 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218180 I fixed some packages with trivia

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 1:12 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed. > > FTBFS: > > 0ad > arbor > CuraEngine > bout++ > cachelib > contour-terminal > dnf5 > dolphin-emu > easyrpg-player > folly > freeopcua > gerbera > gnuradio

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:12 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed. > > gnuradio > Issue filed upstream: https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/issues/6735 Also, not all the maintainers may review the devel list as closely. In

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Results: 37 builds succeeded, 19 failed. FTBFS: 0ad arbor CuraEngine bout++ cachelib contour-terminal dnf5 dolphin-emu easyrpg-player folly freeopcua gerbera gnuradio luxcorerender mangohud nheko wasmedge watchman waybar Please fix your packages and use f39-build-side-69394 side tag: fedpkg bui

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 04:20, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 28/06/2023 08:32, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote: > > How I can fix that? > > Steps how to fix such issues for historical purposes: > > 1. Create a new side tag. > 2. Introduce compatibility fmt9 package. > 3

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

You could bootstrap dnf for the rebuild https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnf/blob/rawhide/f/dnf.spec#_298 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 28/06/2023 08:32, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote: How I can fix that? Steps how to fix such issues for historical purposes: 1. Create a new side tag. 2. Introduce compatibility fmt9 package. 3. Build fmt9 compatibility package. 4. Build fmt 10. 5. Rebuild dnf5 against fmt 10. 6. Untag fmt9 from this

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Wednesday, 28 June 2023 at 08:32, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 23/05/2023 12:22, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote: > > I will use my proven-packager rights to rebuild all dependent packages > > in a separate side tag next week. > > Koji is now broken in this side tag (f39-build-side-69392): > > Er

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 23/05/2023 12:22, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote: I will use my proven-packager rights to rebuild all dependent packages in a separate side tag next week. Koji is now broken in this side tag (f39-build-side-69392): Error: Problem 1: package python3-dnf-4.16.1-2.fc39.noarch from build requires dnf-d

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 23/05/2023 12:22, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote: I will use my proven-packager rights to rebuild all dependent packages in a separate side tag next week. Many packages are not yet ready for fmt 10. Spdlog for example: - https://github.com/gabime/spdlog/issues/2614 - https://github.com/gabime/spdlog/

Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Hello. fmt 10.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .9 to .10. It has both API and ABI changes. Changelog: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/releases/tag/10.0.0 The list of affected packages in Rawhide: 0ad OpenImageIO bear cachelib cantera ceph dnf5 dolphin-emu domoticz easyeffects easy

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:24 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on 2022/07/11 2:43: > 0ad FTBFS on f37 due to different issue from fmt change - scratch build > for F-37 shows virtualenv related > issue - perhaps due to python3.11 changes, and scratch build for F-36 > shows s

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 20/07/2022 16:22, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: 33 pkgs are now using fmt-9 (built successfully with some modification) on rawhide tree Only 1 package still uses fmt8 - 0ad . I think I should retire fmt8 before the F37 is branched. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 5:38 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 7/19/22 08:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < > > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > >> On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >>> I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 7/19/22 08:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ee990d1f61 >> was >>> pushed with just a handful of

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on 2022/07/11 2:43: Hello. fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9. It has both API and ABI changes. Changelog: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/releases/tag/9.0.0 The list of affected packages in Rawhide: 0ad OpenImageIO cantera ceph dolphin-e

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 22/07/19 02:22PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > Now it can be easily mitigated by using fmt8-devel. > > Rawhide compose will be fixed automatically soon, as fmt8 provides missing > libfmt.so.8 shared library. Yes, the *compose*, but those packages will still need to be fixed to not FTBFS.

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 2:23 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 19/07/2022 14:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Unfortunately it's very difficult to "coordinate" things like this with > > a worldwide community. > > True. Nearly impossible without provenpackager righ

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 19/07/2022 14:04, Richard Shaw wrote: Unfortunately it's very difficult to "coordinate" things like this with a worldwide community. True. Nearly impossible without provenpackager rights, I'd say. In reality, a week really isn't enough time but we can't have stuff like this going on for m

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 19/07/2022 13:53, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: So far I am doing my best to fix this breakage. Now I've fixed 5 of these. Thank you. Currently as far as I am correct 15 pkgs are still broken - I am slowly looking at these. We are working on creating fmt8{,-devel} to mitigate all other breakages

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ee990d1f61 > was > > pushed with just a handful of builds, while many others are broken. What >

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on 2022/07/19 18:31: On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote: I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ee990d1f61 was pushed with just a handful of builds, while many others are broken. What happened here? Maintainers had 1 week to rebuild all t

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 16/07/2022 06:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: So what should we do? Now the timing is rather critical because mass rebuild for F37 is planned at 2022-07-20, which will rebuild fmt-9 on rawhide tree anyway, which will cause rawhide tree breakage. I'm very sorry for this breakage. I've checked 6/10

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 11:38, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ee990d1f61 was > > pushed with just a handful of builds, while many others are broken. What > > happened here? > > Maintainers ha

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote: I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ee990d1f61 was pushed with just a handful of builds, while many others are broken. What happened here? Maintainers had 1 week to rebuild all their packages. Most did nothing. Blame them, not me.

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 19. 07. 22 1:28, Miro Hrončok wrote: dolphin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108353 Sorry, dolphin-emu. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 10. 07. 22 19:43, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: Hello. fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9. It has both API and ABI changes. Changelog: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/releases/tag/9.0.0 The list of affected packages in Rawhide: 0ad OpenImageIO cantera ceph dolphi

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 18/07/2022 23:28, Adam Williamson wrote: Looks like it's failing on some warnings as it's being built with - Wall... Another issue: /builddir/build/BUILD/ceph-17.2.1/src/mon/LogMonitor.cc:418:21: error: no matching function for call to 'format_to(fmt::v9::memory_buffer&, const char [4], c

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 22:15 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 18/07/2022 21:05, Adam Williamson wrote: > > We could temporarily drop Boxes from Workstation, I guess, especially > > since it doesn't work right now due to libsoup hilarity[0]. But we > > should really have a proper fix ASAP.

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 18/07/2022 21:05, Adam Williamson wrote: We could temporarily drop Boxes from Workstation, I guess, especially since it doesn't work right now due to libsoup hilarity[0]. But we should really have a proper fix ASAP. Fixed: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ceph/pull-request/5 -- Sincerely,

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 12:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 13:47 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 3:56 PM wrote: > > > > > > > > Same for ceph. I tried unsucessfully to rebuild it. The bug is not yet > > > upstream, only in Debian yet > > > https://

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 13:47 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 3:56 PM wrote: > > > > > Same for ceph. I tried unsucessfully to rebuild it. The bug is not yet > > upstream, only in Debian yet > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014549 > > > I opened https

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 3:56 PM wrote: > > Same for ceph. I tried unsucessfully to rebuild it. The bug is not yet > upstream, only in Debian yet > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014549 I opened https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56610 -- Kaleb ___

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 18/07/2022 19:12, Kaleb Keithley wrote: Do you have a link to the failed build? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89606207 -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 3:56 PM wrote: > > Same for ceph. I tried unsucessfully to rebuild it. The bug is not yet > upstream, only in Debian yet > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014549 > Do you have a link to the failed build? -- Kaleb _

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 17/07/2022 21:55, zebo...@gmail.com wrote: Same for ceph. I tried unsucessfully to rebuild it. Can you try this workaround: %global optflags %(echo %{optflags} -DFMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM) -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ d

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 18/07/2022 18:18, Richard Shaw wrote: That worked for now. What's the long term fix? It will work until the next major release - 10.0.0. All upstreams need to update to the new API? Yes. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) _

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 17/07/2022 15:54, Richard Shaw wrote: /usr/include/fmt/core.h:1733:7: error: static assertion failed: Cannot format an argument. To make type T formattable provide a formatter specialization: https://fmt.dev/latest/api.html#udt Can you try the followin

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 16/07/2022 06:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: So what should we do? Now the timing is rather critical because mass rebuild for F37 is planned at 2022-07-20, which will rebuild fmt-9 on rawhide tree anyway, which will cause rawhide tree breakage. Just merged[1] the side tag to Rawhide. The followin

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 16/07/2022 06:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: So what should we do? Now the timing is rather critical because mass rebuild for F37 is planned at 2022-07-20, which will rebuild fmt-9 on rawhide tree anyway, which will cause rawhide tree breakage. FTBFS issues will be created. To avoid this, should

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Ben Beasley wrote on 2022/07/12 1:50: Two of the three packages I tried to rebuild (bear and fmidi) failed with errors like: /usr/include/fmt/core.h:1733:7: error: static assertion failed: Cannot format an argument. To make type T formattable provide a formatter specialization:https://fmt.dev

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Yes, fmidi added support upstream after I reported the issue (and after I applied the FMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM workaround in Fedora). I adjusted the Fedora package to track upstream as soon as a patch became available[1]. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fmidi/c/5d985a532037b7b366d33c478be4

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 12:58 -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > +ntfs2btrfs I just rebuilt this one in the sidetag. Cheers Davide ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 22/07/14 07:32PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 11/07/2022 18:21, Ben Beasley wrote: > > I don’t believe this list is nearly complete. Two packages I maintain > > that would be affected (fmidi and giada) are absent from the list. > > It's very strange: > > $ dnf repoquery -q --releasev

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 12/07/2022 22:13, Ben Beasley wrote: Both bear and fmidi are now rebuilt into the side tag. I defined the preprocessor macro FMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM as a temporary workaround (noting that this will not be available in fmt 10.0). It was fixed by upstream[1]. I think maintainer should backport

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 11/07/2022 18:50, Ben Beasley wrote: If that FTBFS rate is typical of the full set of affected packages, then merging the side tag without resolving the API incompatibilities in dependent packages will be pretty disruptive to Rawhide as a whole. I want to merge everything before the Fedora

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 11/07/2022 18:21, Ben Beasley wrote: I don’t believe this list is nearly complete. Two packages I maintain that would be affected (fmidi and giada) are absent from the list. It's very strange: $ dnf repoquery -q --releasever=rawhide --disablerepo="*" --qf="%{name}" --enablerepo=fedora-sou

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Sunday, 10 July 2022 at 19:43, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > Hello. > > fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9. It has both > API and ABI changes. [...] > mkvtoolnix mkvtoolnix updated and built in the side tag: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8945

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Both bear and fmidi are now rebuilt into the side tag. I defined the preprocessor macro FMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM as a temporary workaround (noting that this will not be available in fmt 10.0). I filed an issue upstream with fmidi: https://github.com/jpcima/fmidi/issues/5 On 7/11/22 12:50, Ben Be

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Hi Vitaly, Will try and take care of folly ASAP - thanks! -- Michel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Hello, > Setting up a copr repo to find all other breakages sounds like a good idea. I'm actually working on a tool to help with such use cases. It may be a bit early since I only made an internal alpha release, and only planned to go public by the end of this month with it, but since that may he

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 7/11/22 09:50, Ben Beasley wrote: Two of the three packages I tried to rebuild (bear and fmidi) failed with errors like: /usr/include/fmt/core.h:1733:7: error: static assertion failed: Cannot format an argument. To make type T formattable provide a formatter specialization:https://fmt.dev/

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Two of the three packages I tried to rebuild (bear and fmidi) failed with errors like: /usr/include/fmt/core.h:1733:7: error: static assertion failed: Cannot format an argument. To make type T formattable provide a formatter specialization:https://fmt.dev/latest/api.html#udt 1733 | form

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

I don’t believe this list is nearly complete. Two packages I maintain that would be affected (fmidi and giada) are absent from the list. Using the following command:     mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --dnf-cmd -- repoquery --whatrequires 'libfmt.so.8*' I found these additional dependent pack

Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Hello. fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9. It has both API and ABI changes. Changelog: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/releases/tag/9.0.0 The list of affected packages in Rawhide: 0ad OpenImageIO cantera ceph dolphin-emu domoticz folly libsonata mkvtoolnix sdrpp spdlog

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 18:13:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 06. 07. 21 17:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: This is Python 3.10 related. https://docs.python.org/3.10/whatsnew/3.10.html#removed "Remove deprecated aliases to Collections Abstract Base Classes from the collections module

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 8:19 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > folly failed: > > /usr/bin/ld: ../../../libfolly.so.2021.06.07.00: undefined reference to > `typeinfo for snappy::Source' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > I verified that "-lsnappy" is in the command line so not sure what's goi

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 06. 07. 21 17:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: This is Python 3.10 related. https://docs.python.org/3.10/whatsnew/3.10.html#removed "Remove deprecated aliases to Collections Abstract Base Classes from the collections module." E.g. use collections.abc.Sequence instead of collections.Se

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:03:09AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 4:50 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 05. 07. 21 15:14, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > 0ad failed: > > > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > >File > > > > > "/builddir/build/BUILD/0ad-0.0.24b-alpha/libra

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 4:50 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 07. 21 15:14, Richard Shaw wrote: > > 0ad failed: > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > >File > > > "/builddir/build/BUILD/0ad-0.0.24b-alpha/libraries/source/spidermonkey/mozjs-78.6.0/build-debug/../js/src/../../configure.py",

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 05. 07. 21 15:14, Richard Shaw wrote: 0ad failed: Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/builddir/build/BUILD/0ad-0.0.24b-alpha/libraries/source/spidermonkey/mozjs-78.6.0/build-debug/../js/src/../../configure.py", line 25, in     from mozbuild.configure import (   File "/builddir

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 08:19:11AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > folly failed: > > /usr/bin/ld: ../../../libfolly.so.2021.06.07.00: undefined reference > to `typeinfo for snappy::Source' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > I verified that "-lsnappy" is in the command line so not sure

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 7/5/21 6:27 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: waybar failed with: > ... This looks to be fmt related... Fixed and rebuilt in the side-tag -- Best regards, Aleksei Bavshin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

I didn't list the other builds as they all failed due to folly failing so once that's fixed they will likely complete. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

On 05/07/2021 15:27, Richard Shaw wrote: This looks to be fmt related... Yes, due to API changes. We need to open FTBFS bugs. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscrib

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

waybar failed with: In file included from ../include/modules/disk.hpp:8, from ../src/modules/disk.cpp:1: ../include/util/format.hpp: In instantiation of ‘constexpr decltype (ctx.begin()) fmt::v8::formatter::parse(ParseContext&) [with ParseContext = fmt::v8::basic_format_parse_cont

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

ceph failed with: builddir/build/BUILD/ceph-16.2.4/src/common/Formatter.cc: In member function 'virtual void ceph::XMLFormatter::close_section()': /builddir/build/BUILD/ceph-16.2.4/src/common/Formatter.cc:449:8: error: 'transform' is not a member of 'std' 449 | std::transform(section.begin(),

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

folly failed: /usr/bin/ld: ../../../libfolly.so.2021.06.07.00: undefined reference to `typeinfo for snappy::Source' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status I verified that "-lsnappy" is in the command line so not sure what's going on there, but it doesn't look fmt related. https://kojipkgs.fe

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

0ad failed: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/builddir/build/BUILD/0ad-0.0.24b-alpha/libraries/source/spidermonkey/mozjs-78.6.0/build-debug/../js/src/../../configure.py", line 25, in from mozbuild.configure import ( File "/builddir/build/BUILD/0ad-0.0.24b-alpha/libraries/source/sp

  1   2   >