On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:47 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11. 02. 20 12:04, Ian McInerney wrote:
> > Has that change been accepted yet? I don't see it mentioned on the main
> F32
> > changes page, and I can't seem to find a FESCO ticket for it.
>
> Not even proposed: Category: ChangePageIncomplet
On 11. 02. 20 12:04, Ian McInerney wrote:
Has that change been accepted yet? I don't see it mentioned on the main F32
changes page, and I can't seem to find a FESCO ticket for it.
Not even proposed: Category: ChangePageIncomplete
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
__
Has that change been accepted yet? I don't see it mentioned on the main F32
changes page, and I can't seem to find a FESCO ticket for it.
-Ian
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:45 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 11/02/2020 10:29, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 11:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
>
On 11/02/2020 10:29, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 11:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
Hello all.
Why we still has ancient Boost 1.69 even in Rawhide? Some packages
require 1.70+ and I cannot update them in repositories.
Latest Boost version is 1.72 (released 2019/12/11).
It
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 11:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
> Why we still has ancient Boost 1.69 even in Rawhide? Some packages
> require 1.70+ and I cannot update them in repositories.
>
> Latest Boost version is 1.72 (released 2019/12/11).
It was a change proposal for Fedora
Hello all.
Why we still has ancient Boost 1.69 even in Rawhide? Some packages
require 1.70+ and I cannot update them in repositories.
Latest Boost version is 1.72 (released 2019/12/11).
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel
