On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:23 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
>
> On 10/27/2013 09:45 AM, Alexandre Moine wrote:
>
>
> Recently, some Working Groups has been created [1]. In the most of
> case (except in the Server WG with Truong Anh. Tuan), we don't have
> any representant of the ambassador gro
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:45:02AM +0100, Alexandre Moine wrote:
> I think it's a great idea to strengthens the links between ambassadors
> and WG. The ambassador is an important link between users and
> developpers, on my mind, he must be in these groups.
We've tried to include as broad a section
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/27/2013 07:34 AM, Nobrakal wrote:
> 2013/10/27, Frank Murphy :
>> On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 19:05:37 +0800 Christopher Meng
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are
>>> working for Red Hat. Well it's helpful to s
On 10/27/2013 09:45 AM, Alexandre Moine wrote:
Recently, some Working Groups has been created [1]. In the most of
case (except in the Server WG with Truong Anh. Tuan), we don't have
any representant of the ambassador group.
Actually the server WG has two ambasssadors ( I myself am also
ambas
Hi,
Fesco is entitled to delegate their "authority" to anyone they see fit to
do so.
For instance, FPC members are designated by Fesco and rule packaging
guidelines.
Besides, the final decision was taken by Fesco.
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
2013/10/28 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>
> On 10/27/2013 11:34 AM, Nobrakal wrote:
>
>> 2013/10/27, Frank Murphy:
>>
>>> >On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 19:05:37 +0800
>>> >Christopher Meng wrote:
>>> >
>>>
>>It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are
>>working for Red Hat. Well it'
On 10/27/2013 11:34 AM, Nobrakal wrote:
2013/10/27, Frank Murphy:
>On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 19:05:37 +0800
>Christopher Meng wrote:
>
>>It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are
>>working for Red Hat. Well it's helpful to strengthen our technical
>>base but are there any plots f
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 10:01 +0100, Nobrakal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you very much for your responses. I criticized just the abscence
> of mail to prevent ambassadors for the creation of WG.
As a French native speaker, I know what you meant here, but "prevent"
means "empêcher", not "prévenir" ;
Hi all,
Thank you very much for your responses. I criticized just the abscence
of mail to prevent ambassadors for the creation of WG. I understand
your position. You're right. I overestimate
the place of ambassador in the developpement production.
Please forgive me about this big mistake.
Alexand
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Nobrakal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for the double-post, but I think it's necessary.
>
> Recently, some Working Groups has been created [1]. In the most of
> case (except in the Server WG with Truong Anh. Tuan), we don't have
> any representant of the ambassador gr
On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 14:46 +0100, Nobrakal wrote:
> 2013/10/27, Ankur Sinha :
> > On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 12:27 +0100, Nobrakal wrote:
> >> In my mind, Ambassadors are more near of users than developers or
> >> marketing team. Ambassadors organize all the events, submit new
> >> idea... It is really
2013/10/27, Ankur Sinha :
> On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 12:27 +0100, Nobrakal wrote:
>> In my mind, Ambassadors are more near of users than developers or
>> marketing team. Ambassadors organize all the events, submit new
>> idea... It is really important to have at least an ambassador in WG
>
> I don't t
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:34:01 +0100
Nobrakal wrote:
> In my mind, Ambassadors are more near of users than developers or
> marketing team. Ambassadors organize all the events, submit new
> idea... It is really important to have at least an ambassador in WG
>
> Alexandre
It is also important to ha
2013/10/27, Frank Murphy :
> On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 19:05:37 +0800
> Christopher Meng wrote:
>
>> It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are
>> working for Red Hat. Well it's helpful to strengthen our technical
>> base but are there any plots for other people?
Well, if I believe th
Hi,
I think that coordinators and Fesco tried to integrate as much as possible
community members.
But truth is that most people who self-nominated were RH employees, so i'd
rather say that RH employees even had an handicap.
As for the Cloud WG -i can't speak for other WG-, we wish that non-voting
It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are working for
Red Hat. Well it's helpful to strengthen our technical base but are there
any plots for other people?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
2013/10/27, H. Guémar :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your concern on that topic, off course, fedora.next would be an
> half-assed
> initiative if we forget communication and community mgmt. And i'm pretty
> sure that
> everyone here agrees with you on that point.
>
> As for myself, I also intend to represe
Hi,
Thanks for your concern on that topic, off course, fedora.next would be an
half-assed
initiative if we forget communication and community mgmt. And i'm pretty
sure that
everyone here agrees with you on that point.
As for myself, I also intend to represent "users" inside the Cloud WG, so
i'll
Hi all,
Sorry for the double-post, but I think it's necessary.
Recently, some Working Groups has been created [1]. In the most of
case (except in the Server WG with Truong Anh. Tuan), we don't have
any representant of the ambassador group.
I exaggerate, because some developers are ambassadors (li
19 matches
Mail list logo
