On 2 October 2013 18:55, Till Maas wrote:
> This does not take subpackages into account. Not sure, how relevant it
> is for the 50 packages you plan to adjust, but it would be an issue for
> e.g. wireshark-gnome.
Sure, in this case I'd have to manually change %{name} to the subpackage name.
> Ne
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 01:47:57PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> What would people think about doing this in #fedora.spec files?
>
> # make the software center load faster
> desktop-file-edit %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop \
> --set-key=X-AppInstall-Package --set-value=%{name}
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> What would people think about doing this in #fedora.spec files?
>
> # make the software center load faster
> desktop-file-edit %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop \
> --set-key=X-AppInstall-Package --set-value=%{name}
(No, thi
On 2 October 2013 15:46, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> It seems a reasonable enough optimization, although you'd obviously still
> need to the fallback to querying the database.
Right; the amount of delay at startup is proportional to the number of
requests we do. Do you think it's acceptable to add t
Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) said:
> What would people think about doing this in #fedora.spec files?
>
> # make the software center load faster
> desktop-file-edit %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop \
> --set-key=X-AppInstall-Package --set-value=%{name}
>
> It makes the s
What would people think about doing this in #fedora.spec files?
# make the software center load faster
desktop-file-edit %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop \
--set-key=X-AppInstall-Package --set-value=%{name}
It makes the software center load much faster as we don't have to
lookup
