Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-20 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 7/20/22 13:48, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > (Sorry for the messed up line wrapping. I wanted to get this out.) > > Hi Jerry, > > On 22/07/06 08:13PM, Jerry James wrote: >> - golang-github-google-cel (eclipseo, @go-sig): needs the Go runtime >> from the antlr4-project package >> - golang-google

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-20 Thread Ben Beasley
On 7/19/22 21:59, Jerry James wrote: On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 8:13 PM Jerry James wrote: The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. These 3 packages are the only ones that have not been dealt with. These packages will fail the mass rebu

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-20 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 11:48 AM Maxwell G wrote: > I'm replying as a member of the go-sig, as the primary maintainer is pretty > busy lately. > > At least 289 source packages (recursively) BuildRequire > golang-github-google-cel-devel[1]. Some of these packages only provide > `-devel` subpackages

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-20 Thread Maxwell G via devel
(Sorry for the messed up line wrapping. I wanted to get this out.) Hi Jerry, On 22/07/06 08:13PM, Jerry James wrote: > - golang-github-google-cel (eclipseo, @go-sig): needs the Go runtime > from the antlr4-project package > - golang-google-grpc (eclipseo, @go-sig): needs > golang-github-google-ce

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-19 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 8:13 PM Jerry James wrote: > The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. The parser > generators, which are written in Java, will no longer be available on > i686. If absolutely necessary, we could continue to pac

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-19 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 7:06 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > How to find they are absolutely necessary? if-in them back if theirs > maintainers rise hand? > > Because that sounds like the way to go. Seeing the depndece chain, There > seems to be no pure show stopper. Yes, since none of the maintainers

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-19 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 11:31 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > Not sure why your list does not include these, but the following > packages also build-require antlr-C++: > * gdl - already has java bcond; BR on antlr would need to be wrapped into > bcond > * nco - seems to have ability to be built with

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-14 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 7/11/22 07:31, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 4:15 AM Jerry James wrote: The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. The parser Thanx a lot for sharing the thoughts. generators, which are written in Java, will

Re: ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-10 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 4:15 AM Jerry James wrote: > > The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. The parser > generators, which are written in Java, will no longer be available on > i686. If absolutely necessary, we could continue to p

ANTLR packages and i686

2022-07-06 Thread Jerry James
The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. The parser generators, which are written in Java, will no longer be available on i686. If absolutely necessary, we could continue to package the various language runtimes for i686. That would be