On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:44:22PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:42:57AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > We could either look at modifying the ExternalRedirecct
> > > extension to be something like DocsRedirect and hard-code the
> Annnd https://pagure.io/fedora-in
Jerry James wrote:
> Here's something I didn't expect from the new ABI gate.
Why did you not expect it? I pointed out this exact issue on January 13,
right after this change was announced, and ~5 days before it was implemented
without anybody responding to my objection:
https://pagure.io/fesco/
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:42:57AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > We could either look at modifying the ExternalRedirecct
> > extension to be something like DocsRedirect and hard-code the
Annnd https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6650
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
On 01/23/2018 01:19 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> Hopefully the Bodhi maintainers can have a look; Bodhi may be caching
> the decision here. IIRC, there's a cronjob to synchronize on the
> Bodhi side.
Correct - currently Bodhi polls Greenwave every 6 hours, so it could
take a bit for it to notice the d
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:37:56PM +0100, Rafael dos Santos wrote:
> On 23 January 2018 at 18:20, Ralph Bean wrote:
>
> I've removed the abicheck requirement from the greenwave policies for
> > now until we know more:
> > https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=
> > 46
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:13:02AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
> >
> > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> > waiver
On 23 January 2018 at 18:20, Ralph Bean wrote:
I've removed the abicheck requirement from the greenwave policies for
> now until we know more:
> https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=
> 465f155d140a9fbe34f0f51dbfc2137b2900a6f8
>
Do we have to do anything to proceed
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:21:02PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
> >
> > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> > waiverdb
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:57:34PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > Here's something I didn't expect from the new ABI gate. Which, before
> > I go further, I think will be a great idea nearly all of the time. I
> > think avoiding
(Resending with correct docs list cc. Sorry about that.)
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:21:56PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It's a bit off-topic, but...when this happens, what do we do about
> > links? There are probably many lin
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:21:56PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's a bit off-topic, but...when this happens, what do we do about
> links? There are probably many links to this page. This applies to
> anything being 'converted' from the wiki to docs, I guess...can we make
> wiki URLs redirect t
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 08:13 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
> >
> > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> > waiverdb-cli
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
>
> Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> waiverdb-cli) which will allow the update to go through despite of the failing
> te
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
>
> Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> waiverdb-cli) which will allow the update to go through despite of the failing
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:57:34PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Here's something I didn't expect from the new ABI gate. Which, before
> I go further, I think will be a great idea nearly all of the time. I
> think avoiding unintentional ABI breaks in stable releases is a worthy
> goal.
>
> But ...
On 22 January 2018 at 22:12, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Yep, bodhi is definitely blocking things now without any way to override that
> I can see. :-(
> I've got a similar situation, I was able to push to batched 5 days ago but
> just now bodhi sent me an email saying "Bodhi is unable to request th
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Rex Dieter
> I am logged into bodhi. I am looking at the page for the gap-pkg-io
> update I mentioned earlier:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e45a7bb9a7
>
> There is no button to push to batched. There are only two buttons:
> Edit and U
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> As far as I know and can tell, those gating things are advisory only at this
> point.
I am logged into bodhi. I am looking at the page for the gap-pkg-io
update I mentioned earlier:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e45a7bb9a
Jerry James wrote:
> Are ABI changes completely disallowed in all circumstances?
no.
As far as I know and can tell, those gating things are advisory only at this
point.
-- Rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
Here's something I didn't expect from the new ABI gate. Which, before
I go further, I think will be a great idea nearly all of the time. I
think avoiding unintentional ABI breaks in stable releases is a worthy
goal.
But ... I maintain a package called gap. It provides what amounts to
a scriptin
20 matches
Mail list logo
