On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:17 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> Thanks everyone who've already rebuilt their packages.
>
> I just kicked off a script that attempts to rebuild everything still
> affected; the rebuilds are marked as --background which I believe makes
> them lower priority in Koji than ot
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 21:26 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Thanks to Kalev Lember who wrote a script identifying the affected
> packages. Using its output, Dave Malcolm has just mass-filed bugs
> against the packages which we could identify and he's looking to get
> these rebuilt en-masse as well
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 21:26 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> a lot of packages were rebuilt for Python 2.7 recently, but
> unfortunately they've turned out to be not all that needed rebuilding.
> Essentially, all packages that contain .py files that aren't
> below /usr/lib(64)/pyt
Hi everybody,
a lot of packages were rebuilt for Python 2.7 recently, but
unfortunately they've turned out to be not all that needed rebuilding.
Essentially, all packages that contain .py files that aren't
below /usr/lib(64)/python need to be rebuilt so that their respective
pre-built .pyc/.pyo fi
