On 22 January 2018 at 12:21, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 22 January 2018 at 15:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [,,]
>>
>> > OK so here you just gave me +1 for a). Thx.
>> >
>>
>> No I didn't. It is clear that our versions of English are not syncing
>> up so I am not sure how to communicate clear
On 22 January 2018 at 15:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
[,,]
> > OK so here you just gave me +1 for a). Thx.
> >
>
> No I didn't. It is clear that our versions of English are not syncing
> up so I am not sure how to communicate clearly with you. You think I
> am reading in between the lines, but
On 22 January 2018 at 00:29, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 22 January 2018 at 03:10, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko
>> wrote:
>
> [..]
>>
>> > 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up
>> > to
>> > ABI level so all this s
On 22 January 2018 at 12:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
<<>>
[..]
> >> > 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate
> up
> >> > to
> >> > ABI level so all this should be:
> >> >
> >> > a) removed
> >> > b) replaced by %{el6} and %{el7} (and if it is anything older ..
> remove)
On 22 January 2018 at 03:39, Neal Gompa wrote:
[..]
> Personally, I'd like it to be easier to make multi-distro spec files
> by leveraging the increasing commonality among distributions. It's
> already not that bad these days, the main issue is what RPM features
> are supported for each target dis
- Mail original -
De: "Fabio Valentini"
Hi,
> I'm particularly looking forward to improvements regarding golang. The
> automated .spec generation is nice for getting new packages started, but
> maintaining those packages currently is a small nightmare in itself due to
> brittle scripts
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:29 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
> On 22 January 2018 at 03:10, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko
>> wrote:
>
> [..]
>>
>> > 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up
>> > to
>> > ABI level so all t
On Jan 22, 2018 11:32, wrote:
- Mail original -
De: "Stephen John Smoogen"
> They pull in what they want to make it work and could
> give a care if it is readable to anyone else.
The problem is that past a certain point those become effectively
unmaintainable and start dragging Fedora
- Mail original -
De: "Neal Gompa"
> the main issue is what RPM features
are supported for each target distribution. Making things less ugly
for gracefully degrading would be very nice. :)
Well it would be really nice if someone @downstream watched for Fedora
packaging guidelines cha
- Mail original -
De: "Stephen John Smoogen"
> They pull in what they want to make it work and could
> give a care if it is readable to anyone else.
The problem is that past a certain point those become effectively
unmaintainable and start dragging Fedora in the EL blackhole instead of
Hi,
I can get a few hundreds of those disappear if the Go packaging guidelines I
posted get accepted
Otherwise, they are a symptom of technical debt accumulation in EL, nothing more
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.f
On 22 January 2018 at 03:39, Neal Gompa wrote:
[..]
>
> Multi-distro spec files in itself aren't that bad. In my experience,
> the things that drag you down are the Debian/Ubuntu and RHEL/SLE
> targets. But they eventually catch up. However, the sad reality is,
> you can only go so far without imp
On 22 January 2018 at 03:10, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko
> wrote:
>
[..]
> > 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up
> to
> > ABI level so all this should be:
> >
> > a) removed
> > b) replaced by %{el6} and %{el7} (
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> As preface some oneliner result:
>>
>
>> 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up to
>> ABI level so all this should be:
>>
>> a) removed
>> b) rep
On 21 January 2018 at 15:54, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> As preface some oneliner result:
>
> 8) Why we have %{centos} %ifings? Theoretically Centos is EL derivate up to
> ABI level so all this should be:
>
> a) removed
> b) replaced by %{el6} and %{el7} (and if it is anything older .. remove)
> c) i
15 matches
Mail list logo
