On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 10:30 AM Major Hayden wrote:
> On 6/2/21 9:07 AM, Benjamin Beasley wrote:
> > I personally think the individual packages approach will be easier to
> maintain in the long run. (If you do go down that road, I’m planning to
> help review them.)
>
> I am leaning in that direct
On 6/2/21 9:07 AM, Benjamin Beasley wrote:
I personally think the individual packages approach will be easier to maintain
in the long run. (If you do go down that road, I’m planning to help review
them.)
I am leaning in that direction, too. Mohamed (the current maintainer)
and I (new co-main
I personally think the individual packages approach will be easier to maintain
in the long run. (If you do go down that road, I’m planning to help review
them.)
– Ben Beasley
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send a
On 5/25/21 7:29 AM, Major Hayden wrote:
1) Should I make separate Fedora packages/specs for each CLI
component and the SDK components? The SDK components look
nearly identical from a packaging standpoint (no executables
there, just libraries in each). If so, that would be abo
On 25.05.2021 16:27, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Should we consider the overhead costs (storage, compute, accounting etc) for
doing
100 small versus one large package?
Already discussed multiple times:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/33YRLXPBUHVFS3OIPNE
On 5/25/21 9:01 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 25. 05. 21 14:29, Major Hayden wrote:
>
> The culprit of trying to maintain them in one component is that they are
> released independently. Maintaining various subpackages with different
> versions
> and release cycles from the same spec file is
On 25. 05. 21 15:18, Major Hayden wrote:
Have a look at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros
Where has this been all my life? 😱
It is somewhat new. Let me know if you need assistance or if you find problems.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
On 5/25/21 8:01 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The culprit of trying to maintain them in one component is that they are
released independently. Maintaining various subpackages with different
versions and release cycles from the same spec file is a huge PITA.
However, so is maintaining 100 packages. T
On 5/25/21 7:53 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I don't have much feedback for you, but just wanted to say thank you for
working on this. It's so nice when we can just pull packages from our
repos and just start using them. A lot of cloud providers have containers
these days for their CLI tools, but I'd pr
On 25. 05. 21 14:29, Major Hayden wrote:
👋🏻 Hello there,
I'm eager to package Azure's CLI tools for Fedora that would allow users to
manage their Microsoft Azure cloud infrastructure. This would help with CI/CD,
information security, monitoring, and of course, deployments.
However, these clo
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:30 AM Major Hayden wrote:
>
> 🏻 Hello there,
>
> I'm eager to package Azure's CLI tools for Fedora that would allow users
> to manage their Microsoft Azure cloud infrastructure. This would help
> with CI/CD, information security, monitoring, and of course, deployments.
>
On 5/25/21 8:29 AM, Major Hayden wrote:
> 👋🏻 Hello there,
>
> I'm eager to package Azure's CLI tools for Fedora that would allow users
> to manage their Microsoft Azure cloud infrastructure. This would help
> with CI/CD, information security, monitoring, and of course, deployments.
I don't ha
👋🏻 Hello there,
I'm eager to package Azure's CLI tools for Fedora that would allow users
to manage their Microsoft Azure cloud infrastructure. This would help
with CI/CD, information security, monitoring, and of course, deployments.
However, these cloud tools are a bit tricky to package. Ther
13 matches
Mail list logo
