Re: [security fix] ghostscript rebased to 9-20 for all releases

2016-10-07 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
Thank you, Solomon for that info, actually gutenprint maintainer is my colleague, but he is sick today. I'm adding him into CC, so he's aware of it when he returns. ;) 2 Zdenek: Please, look at the whole thread here - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/mes

Re: [security fix] ghostscript rebased to 9-20 for all releases

2016-10-07 Thread Solomon Peachy
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:14:57PM -, David Kaspar wrote: > Right now, I think only packages that depend on ghostscript-devel subpackage > *might* be affected by this change. List of those packages: > > ariamaestosa > > ImageMagick > > wfdb Add gutenprint to that list. I don't expect the exi

[security fix] ghostscript rebased to 9-20 for all releases

2016-10-07 Thread David Kaspar
Hello folks, ghostscript package has been rebased to version 9.20 across all current Fedora releases. I am very well aware that we shouldn't do rebases for current releases, to avoid stability problems. However, I have decided for this step in order to fix 4 CVEs that arrived yesterday for ghos