On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:45:22PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 12.12.2013 14:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >>>On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibo
Dne 12.12.2013 14:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the uni
On 13 November 2013 16:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:57:38PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:52:27 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>
>> > The development instance of pkgdb2 is at:
>> >
>> > http://209.132.184.188/
>>
>> That page says "Vers
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
> >>passing
> >>and I seem to be ab
Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are passing
and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be a
good time to ca
On 12/12/2013 09:15 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>> How is a new user or a GUI-only person
>
> Well, you were talking about someone who had just used rpm -qf, so in
> that context rpm -qi made a lot of sense.
Yes, you're right, in that context, it makes sense.
> For example: https://apps.fedorapro
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 09:02 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 04:19 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> >> The idea behind is:
> >>
> >> you have some application with an issue/error. You'll do rpm -qf
> >> and will get a package name
On 12/12/2013 04:19 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> The idea behind is:
>>
>> you have some application with an issue/error. You'll do rpm -qf
>> and will get a package name, not necessarily the source
>> package name.
>> When filing a bug ag
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> The idea behind is:
>
> you have some application with an issue/error. You'll do rpm -qf
> and will get a package name, not necessarily the source
> package name.
> When filing a bug against a package, you'll need to know the source
> pac
On 12/11/2013 09:19 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:52:58PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>>
So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do,
but don't
forget to report how you did
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 09:55 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Dan Mashal [10/12/2013 11:29] :
> >
> > Can we get a "my packages" button? Or am I blind and not seeing one?
>
> There's a "Restrict to owner:" form where you can enter your FAS username.
Also works if you just click on your nick on th
* Dan Mashal [10/12/2013 11:29] :
>
> Can we get a "my packages" button? Or am I blind and not seeing one?
There's a "Restrict to owner:" form where you can enter your FAS username.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:52:58PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> >> So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do,
> >> but don't
> >> forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
> >>
On 12/10/2013 02:20 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
>> So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
>> don't
>> forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
>> feel
>> free to note them at:
>
> Just a heads-up, christmas holidays are
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
>> passing
>> and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would
>>
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are
> passing
> and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be
> a
> good time to call for testers and collect bug reports and
Dne 24.11.2013 00:34, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
There is pros and cons of each.
Agreed. And therefore forcing someone to use one of them or cricitice
someone for having Fedora project on Github is something I don't like.
Unless it's a proper policy and if such policy is proposed I would be
a
Till Maas wrote:
> It is possible, but I have to agree that github is more
> convenient/efficient than the workflow you describe.
Huh? The "export patches, attach to issue tracker" workflow allows me to
work with a normal local clone. The GitHub pull request workflow forces me
to create a fork o
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:34:28PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I really don't see what is missing there, apart from missing automation for
> the one-time creation process.
Something I just noticed:
- Github allows to reply to ticket notifications via email instead of
requiring to change to a
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 01:48:53PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
> >
> > Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the
> > maintainer, apply
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
>
> Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the
> maintainer, apply it with git am and push it; where's the problem?
>
> > possibility to
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:57:25PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
>
> Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the
> maintainer, apply it with git am and push it; where's the problem?
It is possible, but I
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:34:19PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>By using github you are also eliminating the possibility of some people to
>contribute to your project. I personally won't create an account on
>github. Just because I believe that open projects should be hosted on open
>
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> You're forgeting, patch/code reviews,
Export patch from git, attach to new issue in the bug tracker; as the
maintainer, apply it with git am and push it; where's the problem?
> possibility to close or refer to a ticket from the git commit,
Referring just works in Tra
By using github you are also eliminating the possibility of some people to
contribute to your project. I personally won't create an account on github.
Just because I believe that open projects should be hosted on open platforms.
I'd rather us work out a way to have an open patch submission and r
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:34:28PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > The reason is simple. Fedorahosted lacks features, is unplesant and need
> > byrocracy even to create a repository.
>
> Creating a repository is actually the only time "bureaucracy" is required.
> Giving write
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The reason is simple. Fedorahosted lacks features, is unplesant and need
> byrocracy even to create a repository.
Creating a repository is actually the only time "bureaucracy" is required.
Giving write permissions just works over FAS. (There's a FAS group for every
reposito
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:19:35AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:42AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > One thing which is probably an issue with the import process: I looked at
> > the package kdelibs-experimental which has been retired, as seen on pkgdb1:
> > http
On 11/13/2013 02:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
> don't
> forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
> feel
> free to note them at:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infr
Maybe an RFE:
pkgdb2 should be able to scratch the %{summary} in RPM specfile as the
short summary of the package automatically, especially when some
packages change their summary in the spec.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Dne 16.11.2013 02:47, Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
But this is NOT an UPSTREAM project, it is a project developed specifically
for Fedora by Fedora people. I see no valid reason whatsoever this is being
developed on third-party infrastructure. Of course, we cannot force the
whole distro to be develope
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:50:42AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> One thing which is probably an issue with the import process: I looked at
> the package kdelibs-experimental which has been retired, as seen on pkgdb1:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/kdelibs-experimental
> (see Stat
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Not at all true. Any one can tag a build into an unlocked tag such as
> f20-updates-candidate tags such as f20-updates-testing are protected
> and can only be tagged into by an admin in koji. Koji has no concept of
> acls, It doesn't know a
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We discussed this a few years ago! We decided that it was not up to us
> to dictate what hosting upstream projects use, and have left it up to
> developers of those projects.
But this is NOT an UPSTREAM project, it is a project developed specifically
for Fedora by Fedora peop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:07:41 -0700
"T.C. Hollingsworth" escribió:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> > - The idea of "owner" of a package disapear. There are only
> > maintainers on which one of them appears to be the de
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> - The idea of "owner" of a package disapear. There are only maintainers on
> which
> one of them appears to be the dedicated "point of contact" for this package
> (ie:
> the person that gets the bugs in bugzilla).
Koji also has a noti
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:50:42 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously,
> > do, but don't forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you
> > have any problem/RFE feel free to note them at:
> >
> > https:/
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do,
> but don't forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any
> problem/RFE feel free to note them at:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/packagedb2/
Why is this on GitHub and not o
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:57:38PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:52:27 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > The development instance of pkgdb2 is at:
> >
> > http://209.132.184.188/
>
> That page says "Version 1.0.0" at the top and "0.1.0" at the bottom,
> and you r
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:52:27 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> The development instance of pkgdb2 is at:
>
> http://209.132.184.188/
That page says "Version 1.0.0" at the top and "0.1.0" at the bottom,
and you refer to it as pkgdb2.
> - The idea of "owner" of a package disapear. There are on
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:05:10PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dne 13.11.2013 14:52, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
> >don't
> >forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
> >feel
> >free
Dne 13.11.2013 14:52, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
don't
forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE feel
free to note them at:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/packagedb2/
Do I get i
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 03:20:30PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > - The idea of "owner" of a package disapear. There are only maintainers on
> > which
> > one of them appears to be the dedicated "point of contact"
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> - The idea of "owner" of a package disapear. There are only maintainers on
> which
> one of them appears to be the dedicated "point of contact" for this package
> (ie:
> the person that gets the bugs in bugzilla).
Why this new
Dear all,
I have been working for some time on the next version of packagedb/pkgdb [1].
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are passing
and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be a
good time to call for testers and collect bug re
45 matches
Mail list logo
