On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 18:07 +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
> Am 29.08.22 um 15:43 schrieb Dan Čermák:
> > I agree, this needn't block F37, but I still think that this should be
> > fixed. Unless I use microdnf, I cannot upgrade my VPS with 1GB RAM that
> > happily hosts my home page, which is quit
Am 29.08.22 um 15:43 schrieb Dan Čermák:
I agree, this needn't block F37, but I still think that this should be
fixed. Unless I use microdnf, I cannot upgrade my VPS with 1GB RAM that
happily hosts my home page, which is quite a bummer and a bit of a shame
to be honest.
Are you trying to "dnf u
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022, at 4:49 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 1. ZRAM helps a lot here, but I guess with containers when limiting them
> to 1G you really only get 1G since ZRAM works on the system level not
> the container level. In the VM case though ZRAM should help, is ZRAM
> enabled ? ZRAM is en
Hi,
Adam Williamson writes:
> Hey folks! I apologize for the wide distribution, but this seemed like
> a bug it'd be appropriate to get a wide range of input on.
>
> There's a bug that was proposed as an F37 Beta blocker:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907030
>
> it's quite an ol
On 29-08-2022 10:49, Hans de Goede wrote:
I guess if folks can chime in with thoughts here and/or in the bug
report, maybe a consensus will emerge on just how big of an issue this
is (and how likely it is to get fixed). There will presumably be a
FESCo ticket related to prioritized bug status
Hi,
On 8/23/22 02:44, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! I apologize for the wide distribution, but this seemed like
> a bug it'd be appropriate to get a wide range of input on.
>
> There's a bug that was proposed as an F37 Beta blocker:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907030
>
>
