On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 10:46 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
> As I'm its maintainer I also want to point out that Beta-1.3 is also
> missing the x86_64 build of the Astronomy Lab, there was some random (?)
> mirror issue, the Lab is not broken.
>
> Snipped from anaconda-packaging.log:
>
> 03:44:25
On 05/31/2017 02:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:46:10AM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
So I'd strongly prefer a 1.4 build as a random failure @build
infrastructure (which is not the maintainers fault), should not block
any build to be part of a (alpha/beta/final) release
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:46:10AM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
> So I'd strongly prefer a 1.4 build as a random failure @build
> infrastructure (which is not the maintainers fault), should not block
> any build to be part of a (alpha/beta/final) release.
I think ultimately we need a way to get
As I'm its maintainer I also want to point out that Beta-1.3 is also
missing the x86_64 build of the Astronomy Lab, there was some random (?)
mirror issue, the Lab is not broken.
Snipped from anaconda-packaging.log:
03:44:25,447 WARN packaging: Failed to download
'python3-xlrd-0.9.4-5.fc26.noarch
On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 06:57 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.or
