On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 11:51, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Do we need to tell upstream about these patches?
Yes, it's part of maintainer responsibilities.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
-- Del
Do we need to tell upstream about these patches?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 18:03, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> >> Affected packages:
> >> IQmol
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196090
> >
> >> avogadro
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>> Affected packages:
>> IQmol
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196090
>
>> avogadro
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196090
Are avogadro and IQmol affected by the same bug, or was this a mistak
Dear packagers,
On Sunday, 08 February 2015 at 01:06, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> I intend to update openbabel to pre-2.4 (current Git master) in rawhide
> in a few weeks.
This has now landed in rawhide only. I tried rebuilding all packages
that have a build dependency on openbabel. I
