Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-22 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:27:29 +0200 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 04. 20 20:16, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2020, 20:02 +0200 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > >> On 22. 04. 20 19:47, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > >>> Hi Dan, > >>> > >>> I created the list of packages with the

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 22. 04. 20 20:16, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2020, 20:02 +0200 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > >> On 22. 04. 20 19:47, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > >>> Hi Dan, > >>> > >>> I created the list of packages with the fo

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-22 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 22. 04. 20 20:16, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2020, 20:02 +0200 schrieb Miro Hrončok: On 22. 04. 20 19:47, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Hi Dan, I created the list of packages with the following chain of commands: dnf --releasever=rawhide repoquery --whatrequires j

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-22 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2020, 20:02 +0200 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > On 22. 04. 20 19:47, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > I created the list of packages with the following chain of commands: > > > > dnf --releasever=rawhide repoquery --whatrequires json-c | \ > > xargs dnf --release

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-22 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 22. 04. 20 19:47, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Hi Dan, I created the list of packages with the following chain of commands: dnf --releasever=rawhide repoquery --whatrequires json-c | \ xargs dnf --releasever=rawhide info | \ grep -i 'source' | sed -e 's!^.*: !!g' | sort -u; I ran that on F

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-22 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2020, 19:02 +0200 schrieb Dan Horák: > On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:00:37 +0200 > Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > > The SONAME bump has been done, and the re-builds of all packages > > have > > finished successfully. > > looks you have missed s390utils with the rebuilds and it

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-22 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:00:37 +0200 Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > The SONAME bump has been done, and the re-builds of all packages have > finished successfully. looks you have missed s390utils with the rebuilds and it's also missing in the initial list of packages. How did you created the list

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-22 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
The SONAME bump has been done, and the re-builds of all packages have finished successfully. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel

Re: [SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-20 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am Sonntag, den 19.04.2020, 18:22 +0200 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > gluster-block is currently FTBFS for some reason related to the > glusterfs package [2]. The reason for gluster-block has been FTBFS was fixed [1]. There was a clash between config.h in the build-tree and located in /usr/i

[SONAME bump] json-c-0.14 (libjson-c.so.4 -> 5)

2020-04-19 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hello together, as json-c 0.14 has been released today, I'm going to push an updated package to Rawhide within the next days. Within that procedure I'll take care of all needed rebuilds. I don't expect any major FTBFS, since I've already added patches to the packages that needed. The patches