Re: [Mass Rebuild] Strange parsing of %%doc

2013-02-16 Thread Martin Sourada
> On 02/16/2013 01:21 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > I've seen Panu commenting on it before, so I've searched a bit: > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/176565.html Thanks, I didn't read the whole thread back then :-/ On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:06:44 +0200 Panu Matila

Re: [Mass Rebuild] Strange parsing of %%doc

2013-02-16 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 02/16/2013 01:21 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:57:54 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote: Hi all, WRT subject: before I go to file a bug report I want to make sure I'm not exploiting something unsupported in rpmbuild. In a couple of rpms (for which we're also upstream and I'm

Re: [Mass Rebuild] Strange parsing of %%doc

2013-02-16 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:57:54 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote: > Hi all, > > WRT subject: before I go to file a bug report I want to make sure I'm > not exploiting something unsupported in rpmbuild. > > In a couple of rpms (for which we're also upstream and I'm managing > them, so it's fairly easy fo

[Mass Rebuild] Strange parsing of %%doc

2013-02-16 Thread Martin Sourada
Hi all, WRT subject: before I go to file a bug report I want to make sure I'm not exploiting something unsupported in rpmbuild. In a couple of rpms (for which we're also upstream and I'm managing them, so it's fairly easy for me to "workaround" the issue) I have license saved in file with space,