On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
>
> As it's too early to tell which way we'll go with SELinux and golang I
> think it's okay to drop this. Once we start to make some progress into
> making any policy work in snapd we'll either revive this or use a
> maintained pac
As it's too early to tell which way we'll go with SELinux and golang I
think it's okay to drop this. Once we start to make some progress into
making any policy work in snapd we'll either revive this or use a
maintained package.
Best regards
ZK
___
devel
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Petr Lautrbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> libselinux golang bindings [1] haven't been touched since 2014, have
> never been upstreamed, nothing requires/uses them in Fedora and since
> there's another SELinux golang bindings maintained by opencontainers [2]
> I'm going to dr
Hi,
libselinux golang bindings [1] haven't been touched since 2014, have
never been upstreamed, nothing requires/uses them in Fedora and since
there's another SELinux golang bindings maintained by opencontainers [2]
I'm going to drop them from Fedora Rawhide.
[1] https://github.com/fedora-selinu