Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-20 Thread Ian Kent
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 09:55 +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:08:50PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 18:35 +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been > > > renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux. > > >

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-20 Thread Karel Zak
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:22:14AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > Michal Hlavinka píše v Čt 20. 01. 2011 v 10:14 +0100: > > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 18:35:52 Karel Zak wrote: > > > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been > > > renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linu

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-20 Thread Dan Horák
Michal Hlavinka píše v Čt 20. 01. 2011 v 10:14 +0100: > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 18:35:52 Karel Zak wrote: > > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been > > renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux. > > koji did not hadle this change well, because it was not req

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-20 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 18:35:52 Karel Zak wrote: > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been > renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux. koji did not hadle this change well, because it was not required to specify util-linux-ng as buildrequire, but util-linux n

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-20 Thread Karel Zak
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:08:50PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 18:35 +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been > > renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux. > > > > The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems wit

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-19 Thread Ian Kent
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 18:35 +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been > renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux. > > The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without > /etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-19 Thread Karel Zak
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:35:52PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > > > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been > > renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux. > > > > The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support f

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-19 Thread Karel Zak
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:16:03PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:31:27PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > > > > > > Note, it's possible that NFS umount

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-19 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:31:27PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > > > > Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some > > > cases, because not all necessar

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-19 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/19/2011 03:25 PM, Alexander Boström wrote: > ons 2011-01-19 klockan 21:12 +0100 skrev Alexander Boström: > >> Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts? > > Nevermind, /proc/mounts is a symlink so it doesn't matter. > > /Alexander > > /b

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-19 Thread Karel Zak
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > > Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some > > cases, because not all necessary mount options are in /proc/mounts. > > I hope this issue will be f

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-19 Thread Alexander Boström
ons 2011-01-19 klockan 21:12 +0100 skrev Alexander Boström: > Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts? Nevermind, /proc/mounts is a symlink so it doesn't matter. /Alexander -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-19 Thread Alexander Boström
ons 2011-01-19 klockan 18:35 +0100 skrev Karel Zak: > The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without > /etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts). Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts? /Alexander -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org h

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-19 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some > cases, because not all necessary mount options are in /proc/mounts. > I hope this issue will be fixed before F15 release. Is the uhelper option in /proc/mounts? Reg

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-19 Thread Karel Zak
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:35:52PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been > renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux. > > The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without > /etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /

[HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-19 Thread Karel Zak
I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux. The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without /etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts). This feature is enabled by default on Fedora (due to sy