Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-19 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 19.08.10 10:02, Paul W. Frields (sticks...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > So I got it booting after creating the default.target symlink, but the > > > network > > > > no longer comes up automatically (nor services dependant upon it, like > > > sshd). > > > > Did I miss another mail ? > > >

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-19 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:40:10AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 18.08.10 19:35, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:00:16PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:53:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 18.08.10 19:35, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:00:16PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:53:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > > > > It tells me to see the logs for details, but there's not a > single message

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:00:16PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:53:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > > It tells me to see the logs for details, but there's not a single > message > > > > > from systemd in the logs. > > > > > > > > There shou

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 18.08.10 19:00, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Hmm, could be. Note that we log to kmsg as long as syslog isn't up, so > > nothing should get lost -- as long as you manage to get a shell somehow. > > > > BTW, as a side note: a simply fix to bypass the problem with a missing >

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:53:44AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > It tells me to see the logs for details, but there's not a single > > message > > > > from systemd in the logs. > > > > > > There should be an explanation in dmesg, that it cannot find > > default.target. >

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 18.08.10 18:45, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32:01AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 18.08.10 18:15, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > > # systemctl enable ge...@.service prefdm.service getty.target > rc-local.serv

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32:01AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 18.08.10 18:15, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > # systemctl enable ge...@.service prefdm.service getty.target > > rc-local.service remote-fs.target > > > > > > And that should make things work

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 18.08.10 18:15, Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > # systemctl enable ge...@.service prefdm.service getty.target > rc-local.service remote-fs.target > > > > And that should make things work again. > > even after doing this, I still haven't managed to get a single box runnin

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:10:11AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya, > > just a little heads up for when you upgrade a rawhide system that is a > few weeks old to current rawhide: since we changed the way how some of > the default symlinks of systemd are created you will end up with an

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-05 Thread Matthias Runge
On 04/08/10 00:10, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya, > > just a little heads up for when you upgrade a rawhide system that is a > few weeks old to current rawhide: since we changed the way how some of > the default symlinks of systemd are created you will end up with an > installation that lacks m

[HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide upgrades

2010-08-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
Heya, just a little heads up for when you upgrade a rawhide system that is a few weeks old to current rawhide: since we changed the way how some of the default symlinks of systemd are created you will end up with an installation that lacks many of the necessary symlinks -- but only if you upgrade