Re: [Fedora Update] [comment] wallaby-0.16.0-3.fc19

2013-04-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:05:39 +0200 Vít Ondruch wrote: > I have the impression (which might be worng ;)) that this happens > repetitively every release. So I'm wondering, if this step isn't > under-documented in alpha freeze check-list, if something like that > exists? Yeah, we should add to do

Re: [Fedora Update] [comment] wallaby-0.16.0-3.fc19

2013-04-11 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 10.4.2013 18:03, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:44:22 +0200 Vít Ondruch wrote: Why is it 7 days? It used to by 3 days in this period of release cycle, if I remember correctly. Was there some change? Nope. Just a mistake. ;) The pre-beta status wasn't updated everywhere, an

Re: [Fedora Update] [comment] wallaby-0.16.0-3.fc19

2013-04-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
ing had old config. ;( it should be corrected now. Thanks for noting it! > Vít kevin -- > > Původní zpráva ---- > Předmět: [Fedora Update] [comment] wallaby-0.16.0-3.fc19 > Datum:Tue, 09 Apr 2013 22:04:11 + > Od: upda...@fedoraproj

Fwd: [Fedora Update] [comment] wallaby-0.16.0-3.fc19

2013-04-10 Thread Vít Ondruch
Why is it 7 days? It used to by 3 days in this period of release cycle, if I remember correctly. Was there some change? Vít Původní zpráva Předmět:[Fedora Update] [comment] wallaby-0.16.0-3.fc19 Datum: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 22:04:11 + Od: upda