On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 06:37:00PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > I was under the impression that everything in Fedora was MIT licensed
> > unless otherwise specified as per:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Licenses/LicenseAgreement
> > Is that incorrect?
> That's enforced through the FPCA.
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 10:16:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > As we're moving things, can we do something in Pagure to cover this, so
> > the FPCA isn't needed here?
> Note that pagure running at pagure.io no longer requires FPCA, I was here
> speaking about the pagure instance running on
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 04:07:15PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > (Note: pagure can and will enforce the FPCA for dist-git)
>
> I know Richard Fontana has expressed some interest in reducing the need
> for FPCA. Maybe this is
