Thank you. As you guessed, the expression was constructed based on the
practices for multiple separable components that I am accustomed to from the
old guidelines. I hadn’t quite understood that the new guidelines treat that
situation differently. In that case, I agree with your suggested expres
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 11:44 AM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> In python-ezdxf 0.18, a few new Python modules are included that are
> derived from other software. The License is therefore no longer simply
> “MIT.” Of the new modules in question, one is a fork of its original
> upstream. I have treated it
