On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> James Hogarth wrote:
>> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
>> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL
>> policy is not to conflict.
>>
>> I was surprised just now to see ansible
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 01:13 James Hogarth, wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote:
>
>> James Hogarth wrote:
>> > I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
>> > from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL
>> > policy is no
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote:
> James Hogarth wrote:
> > I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
> > from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL
> > policy is not to conflict.
> >
> > I was surprised just now to see ansible
James Hogarth wrote:
> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL
> policy is not to conflict.
>
> I was surprised just now to see ansible 2.5.0 on a test centos system,
> when it wasn't in extras, and
