On Dec 2, 2012, at 7:57 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> Fourteen years ago in 1998 I published a boot loader for i386 that loaded
> linux
> kernel and initrd using filesystem lookup by name from ext2, occupying 446
> bytes
> of MBR plus 2*510 bytes of bootblock from ext2. The space also allowed some
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 07:25:16AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> On 12/03/2012 05:44 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > It's part of the filesystem format, there's no way to change it.
>
> This may be true, but not a priori. extN has feature flags which can
> be used to enable leaving more space, or ot
Am 03.12.2012 19:37, schrieb Lars Seipel:
> On Monday 03 December 2012 14:58:05 Reindl Harald wrote:
>> that is also the reason why /boot has to start on 2048
>> while over decades it was not needed
>
> You really want your partitions to be nicely aligned when using SSDs or
> similar.
maybe, b
On Monday 03 December 2012 14:58:05 Reindl Harald wrote:
> that is also the reason why /boot has to start on 2048
> while over decades it was not needed
You really want your partitions to be nicely aligned when using SSDs or
similar.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
Am 03.12.2012 14:44, schrieb Matthew Garrett:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:12:09PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> This sounds like a different bug than the one thats in the report
>> above. I'd advise the commenter to open a new one on mkfs or anaconda
>> to change the boot sector padding.
>
>
On 12/03/2012 05:44 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:12:09PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> This sounds like a different bug than the one thats in the report
>> above. I'd advise the commenter to open a new one on mkfs or anaconda
>> to change the boot sector padding.
>
>
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:12:09PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This sounds like a different bug than the one thats in the report
> above. I'd advise the commenter to open a new one on mkfs or anaconda
> to change the boot sector padding.
It's part of the filesystem format, there's no way to chan
> I'm not seeing such an option in mke2fs. If it is possible to change the
> padding/offset, then it would be possible for a continuous installation of
> GRUB2's boot.img and core.img, without using block lists.
>
> I did get slightly incorrect, ext4 has two boot sectors, for a total of 1024
>
On Dec 2, 2012, at 4:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:32:20 -0500
> Felix Miata wrote:
>
>> On 2012-12-02 19:21 (GMT) bugzi...@redhat.com composed:
>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872826
>>
>>> --- Comment #19 from Chris Murphy ---
>>> Anaconda should not
On 2012-12-02 18:12 (GMT-0500) Kevin Fenzi composed:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:32:20 -0500 Felix Miata wrote:
Changing the boot track without permission is rude, particularly
since it doesn't bother to report it will obliterate what is already
there present. Fedora ought to be able to be put whe
On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:21:44 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.12.2012 00:15, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> > On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 23:36:58 +0100
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >> grub2 in fedora is crap
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882721
> >
> > I'm not the grub2 maintaine
Am 03.12.2012 00:15, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 23:36:58 +0100
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> grub2 in fedora is crap
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882721
>
> I'm not the grub2 maintainer, but personally I would ask you for a
> more understandable report. What did
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 23:36:58 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> grub2 in fedora is crap
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882721
I'm not the grub2 maintainer, but personally I would ask you for a
more understandable report. What did you want to happen? What happened?
Whats your config?
Pe
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:32:20 -0500
Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012-12-02 19:21 (GMT) bugzi...@redhat.com composed:
>
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872826
>
> > --- Comment #19 from Chris Murphy ---
> > Anaconda should not offer options that are expressly stated as not
> > recomme
Am 02.12.2012 23:32, schrieb Felix Miata:
> On 2012-12-02 19:21 (GMT) bugzi...@redhat.com composed:
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872826
>
>> --- Comment #19 from Chris Murphy ---
>> Anaconda should not offer options that are expressly stated as not
>> recommended
>> by upst
On 2012-12-02 19:21 (GMT) bugzi...@redhat.com composed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872826
--- Comment #19 from Chris Murphy ---
Anaconda should not offer options that are expressly stated as not recommended
by upstream. The problem is ext4's boot sector is only 512 bytes, whi
16 matches
Mail list logo
