Re: [Bug 1675390] mingw-wine-gecko: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30

2019-08-11 Thread Kevin Kofler
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Right. So it sounds like the package could be made to "build" very easily. By shipping the upstream blob as is? That would not really be compliant to Fedora packaging guidelines, would it? At least I would hope it would not be! (This is not really firmware, W

Re: [Bug 1675390] mingw-wine-gecko: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30

2019-08-11 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 01:12:20AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > What would you want to do instead? Keep shipping th Fedora 26 package > > forever? > > Since this is actually an MSI blob that is a drop-in replacement for the MSI > blob from WINE upstream (where the version

Re: [Bug 1675390] mingw-wine-gecko: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30

2019-08-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Miro Hrončok wrote: > What would you want to do instead? Keep shipping th Fedora 26 package > forever? Since this is actually an MSI blob that is a drop-in replacement for the MSI blob from WINE upstream (where the version number expected by WINE is hardcoded and has not changed for years) and t

Re: [Bug 1675390] mingw-wine-gecko: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30

2019-08-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 08. 19 21:10, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 8/9/19 11:02 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: The FTBFS bug was set to ASSIGNED yet your script retired it. Correct. It was still failing to build. I misinterpreted the "retire if still failing to build". This is new and unexpected. It is not that

Re: [Bug 1675390] mingw-wine-gecko: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30

2019-08-09 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 8/9/19 11:02 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: The FTBFS bug was set to ASSIGNED yet your script retired it. Correct. It was still failing to build. I misinterpreted the "retire if still failing to build". This is new and unexpected. It is not reasonable to place a hard timeline on a single person

Re: [Bug 1675390] mingw-wine-gecko: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30

2019-08-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 08. 19 17:45, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 8/8/19 7:45 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: What's the bug? Why should have it not been retired exactly? It didn't build since Fedora 26. The retirement message states: Please fix mingw-wine-gecko at your earliest convenience and set the bug's st

Re: [Bug 1675390] mingw-wine-gecko: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30

2019-08-09 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 8/8/19 7:45 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: What's the bug? Why should have it not been retired exactly? It didn't build since Fedora 26. The retirement message states: Please fix mingw-wine-gecko at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the

Re: [Bug 1675390] mingw-wine-gecko: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30

2019-08-08 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 08. 08. 19 19:23, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On Aug 8, 2019 10:57 AM, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675390 Fedora Release Engineering changed:    What    |Removed |Added

Re: [Bug 1675390] mingw-wine-gecko: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30

2019-08-08 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On Aug 8, 2019 10:57 AM, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675390 Fedora Release Engineering changed:    What    |Removed |Added Status