On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 05:48:33PM +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote:
> I agree with Colin - Docker Base Image is what we should use when
> talking about Docker images which are then used in Docker Layered
> Images as a base layer on top of which you can build. Please don't
Yeah, after thinking about it
On 8.9.2014 16:03, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:29:12AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014, at 11:22 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
In a nutshell, it would be great if we added "Container" to references we
make to the container image (in conversation and docs).
I tend to s
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:28:20AM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
> On 09/07/2014 11:22 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >Per discussion in the #fedora-cloud meeting last Friday I would like to
> >start a thread about the names of the Docker and Atomic deliverables for F21.
> >
> >I know of at leas
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:29:12AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014, at 11:22 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >
> > In a nutshell, it would be great if we added "Container" to references we
> > make to the container image (in conversation and docs).
>
> I tend to say "Docker Base Image"
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014, at 11:22 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> In a nutshell, it would be great if we added "Container" to references we
> make to the container image (in conversation and docs).
I tend to say "Docker Base Image" - that's the terminology upstream
Docker uses: https://docs.docker.com/arti
Hi All,
Per discussion in the #fedora-cloud meeting last Friday I would like to
start a thread about the names of the Docker and Atomic deliverables for F21.
I know of at least a few cases where there has been confusion regarding
what deliverable has been the subject of a conversation on IRC as
