On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 10:01 +0100, Nobrakal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you very much for your responses. I criticized just the abscence
> of mail to prevent ambassadors for the creation of WG.
As a French native speaker, I know what you meant here, but "prevent"
means "empêcher", not "prévenir" ;
Hi all,
Thank you very much for your responses. I criticized just the abscence
of mail to prevent ambassadors for the creation of WG. I understand
your position. You're right. I overestimate
the place of ambassador in the developpement production.
Please forgive me about this big mistake.
Alexand
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Nobrakal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for the double-post, but I think it's necessary.
>
> Recently, some Working Groups has been created [1]. In the most of
> case (except in the Server WG with Truong Anh. Tuan), we don't have
> any representant of the ambassador gr
Hi,
I think that coordinators and Fesco tried to integrate as much as possible
community members.
But truth is that most people who self-nominated were RH employees, so i'd
rather say that RH employees even had an handicap.
As for the Cloud WG -i can't speak for other WG-, we wish that non-voting
It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are working for
Red Hat. Well it's helpful to strengthen our technical base but are there
any plots for other people?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
