Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17

2012-02-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Once packages have been blocked the procedure is to require a review > similar to getting a new package into Fedora. There really needs to be a grace period there. Some problems, such as dependencies broken by the removal, will only get noticed after the package is retir

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17

2012-02-08 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
tdom is picked up by me for Fedora (not EPEL). For EPEL tdom is orphant but not in drop list *still*. > Can I pick up tdom? > > > Takanori > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17

2012-02-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:19:53 +0900, Takanori MATSUURA wrote: > Can I pick up tdom? Once packages have been blocked the procedure is to require a review similar to getting a new package into Fedora. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17

2012-02-08 Thread Takanori MATSUURA
Can I pick up tdom? Takanori 2012/2/2 : Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17 > Orphan tdom > Removing: tdom >    mcu8051ide requires tdom = 0.8.2-8.fc17 >    tkabber requires tdom = 0.8.2-8.fc17 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17

2012-02-08 Thread Tim Fenn
Sorry I'm late on this, but is it still possible for me to pick up python-ZSI? Regards, Tim On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:49:48 -0500 Bill Nottingham wrote: > (comaintainers bcc'd) > > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. > It's that time again for Fedora 17. > > New

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17

2012-02-05 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dmitrij, On 02/05/2012 09:14 AM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote: > (sorry, email server have some problems for now, so I had to create > new messages but bot reply) > A bit OT, but one really nifty solution for this problem is to use a mail client th

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17

2012-02-05 Thread Dmitrij S . Kryzhevich
From the other hand, I'l take: blt bwidget itcl itk tcl-tclxml tcllib tdom tklib For Fedora, not for EPEL. (sorry, email server have some problems for now, so I had to create new messages but bot reply) Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admi

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17

2012-02-04 Thread Dmitrij S . Kryzhevich
> Removing: bwidget > amsn requires bwidget = 1.9.0-3.fc17 > mcu8051ide requires bwidget = 1.9.0-3.fc17 > setools-gui requires bwidget = 1.9.0-3.fc17 > tkabber requires bwidget = 1.9.0-3.fc17 tcl/tk stack is dropped, ok. As tkabber maintainer, should I release ownership? -- devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17

2012-02-02 Thread Tomáš Smetana
Hello, I've taken these: pfscalibration pfstmo pfstools I do use them occasionally but I know nothing about their internals. I just don't want those packages to be purged out of Fedora. I will happily pass them to somebody else or welcome any co-maintainers. Regards, -- Tomáš Sme

[ACTION REQUIRED v4] Retiring packages for F-17

2012-02-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
(comaintainers bcc'd) Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. It's that time again for Fedora 17. New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have failed to build since before Fedora 15. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to buil