Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-23 Thread Patrick MONNERAT
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 15:59 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned a

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:21:24 + Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Bill Nottingham > wrote: > > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for > > orphaned packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages > > where necessary. It's that time again f

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-13 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and e

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-11 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said: > >> I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers >> don't want them. >> > > Rex has said he'd prefer if someone else takes taglib, so go ahead. > > Bill > If he wants to orphan it, I will. -J -- i

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-11 Thread Bill Nottingham
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said: > I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers > don't want them. Rex has said he'd prefer if someone else takes taglib, so go ahead. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Hi, i took ice since it is business critical, co-maintainers are *very* welcome. best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-10 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan TeXmacs Grabbed. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl.

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-09 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
07.02.2011 23:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and exist in F-15. A

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-09 Thread Mat Booth
On 9 February 2011 10:42, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > On 02/08/2011 12:58 PM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: >> Orphan maven-doxia-tools >> Orphan maven-javadoc-plugin >> Orphan plexus-cli > > Added myself as co-maintainer/watcher > Excellent, thanks :-) >> Orphan geronimo-jms >> Orphan geronimo-j

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-09 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
On 02/08/2011 12:58 PM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > Orphan maven-doxia-tools > Orphan maven-javadoc-plugin > Orphan plexus-cli Added myself as co-maintainer/watcher > Orphan geronimo-jms > Orphan geronimo-jta > Orphan geronimo-parent-poms > Orphan apache-resource-bundles Took these -- Stanisla

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread John Reiser
On 02/08/2011 09:21 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: >> On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> Orphan smolt >> >> Don't we still use this by default on all spins? > If no one seems eager to take over maintainership should we replace >

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:21:00AM -0600, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> Orphan smolt > > > > Don't we still use this by default on all spins? > > Did Mike McGrath drop maintainership of smolt

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 02/07/2011 02:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > <38K snipped> > > >> I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers >> don't want them. >> >> -J >> >> > > Please trim the quoted messages in your replies. > > Noted, sorry. I noticed right afte

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 02/07/2011 02:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: <38K snipped> > I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers > don't want them. > > -J > Please trim the quoted messages in your replies. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Divis

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Mohammed Morsi
On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan rubygem-ParseTree > Orphan rubygem-RubyInline > Orphan rubygem-ZenTest > Orphan rubygem-abstract > Orphan rubygem-archive-tar-minitar > Orphan rubygem-mime-types > Orphan rubygem-rcov > Orphan rubygem-ruby2ruby > Orphan rubygem-ruby_parse

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Orphan smolt > > Don't we still use this by default on all spins? Did Mike McGrath drop maintainership of smolt when he stepped out of the Fedora Infrastructure Lead role? I used to maint

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:31:36 -0500 "Paul W. Frields" wrote: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Orphan odfpy > > comaintained by: pfrields > > Orphan python-mwlib > > comaintained by: pfrields > > I don't foresee a problem maintaining the first, and I'll

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan odfpy > comaintained by: pfrields > Orphan python-mwlib > comaintained by: pfrields I don't foresee a problem maintaining the first, and I'll take that over for now. The calibre package depends on it, and I want

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Adam Jackson
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan libgle Taken. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Peter Robinson
> Orphan libfakekey I grabbed this one. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:24:46 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Orphan smolt > > Don't we still use this by default on all spins? I am pretty sure we want to keep this one. The source is on Fedora Hosted. It would be nice of one of the upst

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I took matchpbox-window-manager needed for sandbox. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1RUQUACgkQrlYvE4MpobPj8QCgy0OGT3Ukex0bspNQTbIZhGPr Ql0AnA

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Mat Booth
On 8 February 2011 12:00, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > On 01:59:44 pm Tuesday, February 08, 2011 Mat Booth wrote: >> On 8 February 2011 11:47, Mat Booth wrote: >> > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned >> >> p

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
On 01:59:44 pm Tuesday, February 08, 2011 Mat Booth wrote: > On 8 February 2011 11:47, Mat Booth wrote: > > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > >> packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages w

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
On 01:56:00 pm Tuesday, February 08, 2011 Mat Booth wrote: > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > > necessary. It's that time again for Fedor

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
On 02/08/2011 12:47 PM, Mat Booth wrote: > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned >> packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where >> necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. >> >> The follo

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Mat Booth
On 8 February 2011 11:47, Mat Booth wrote: > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned >> packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where >> necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. >> >> The fo

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Mat Booth
On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and exist i

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Richard Hughes
On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan smolt Don't we still use this by default on all spins? Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan k3b > comaintained by: jreznik rdieter rnovacek This one is well-maintained, but there was some misunderstanding over who's supposed to be the primary maintainer. This should get cleared up today. > Orphan kcm_touchpad I've taken this one. It is shipped on the KD

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 02/07/2011 09:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and exist

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan bigloo >comaintained by: salimma > > Orphan ffcall >comaintained by: salimma > I need these two to work, so I can either maintain or comaintain if the existing comaintainer would like me to. -- Jerry James http://

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan ocaml-lablgl > comaintained by: rjones > Orphan: gtkglarea2 I took these two. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. C

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Dominic Hopf
Am Montag, den 07.02.2011, 15:59 -0500 schrieb Bill Nottingham: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orpha

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and exist in F-15. As > you can see, t

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Mohamed El Morabity
Le lundi 07 février 2011 à 15:59 -0500, Bill Nottingham a écrit : > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orp

[ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Bill Nottingham
Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. The following packages are currently orphaned and exist in F-15. As you can see, there are a lot of dependencies on