Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-09-05 Thread Susi Lehtola
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 00:07:27 +0200 Till Maas wrote: > ddrescue rebus, rebus, ndim, jussilehtola This actually built without modifications. > vecmath jussilehtola, hharrison Fixed. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-09-02 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 06:56:04AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote: > Till Maas wrote: > >Most[0] of the following 56 packages need to be fixed to build in the next > >five or six months to not be retired in prior to branching of Fedora 21: ^^ > >freemind soc

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-09-01 Thread David Tardon
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:07:27AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > hunspell-da caolanm Fixed. The only "problem" with it was a wrong month in a changelog entry... D. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedo

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-08-31 Thread Christopher Meng
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:00:02AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: >> I've solved the bug 992800 as tqsllib FTBFS caused by openssl version. >> >> Please see >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992800 > > I added the patch and rebuil

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-08-31 Thread Till Maas
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:00:02AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > I've solved the bug 992800 as tqsllib FTBFS caused by openssl version. > > Please see > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992800 I added the patch and rebuilt the package for F20 and Rawhide. > If no response still,

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-08-30 Thread Christopher Meng
I've solved the bug 992800 as tqsllib FTBFS caused by openssl version. Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992800 If no response still, please release his ownership. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fed

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-08-30 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:48:21PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > The following packages are did not build for two releases and will be > retired before the Alpha Change Deadline 2013-09-03, unless someone > adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, > please do so now with a

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-08-27 Thread Till Maas
I retired the following packages that were reported earlier recently: curry eclipse-phpeclipse fedora-package-config-smart mod_mono nautilus-sendto-trac open-cobol petitboot simulavr smart tiobench The following packages are did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Chang

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-08-26 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:04:29AM +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote: > On 08/24/2013 11:21 AM, Till Maas wrote: > > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be > > retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to > > actively working on fixing them. > > > ice

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-08-26 Thread Michal Schmidt
On 08/24/2013 11:21 AM, Till Maas wrote: > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be > retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to > actively working on fixing them. > icecream michich Oops, I should have noticed

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-24 Thread Peter Oliver
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Till Maas wrote: tango-icon-theme cwickert tango-icon-theme-extras cwickert I'm working on fixing these. -- Peter Oliver -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fe

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-08-24 Thread Christopher Meng
Just got the perms of pylons. Please don't retire it. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

2013-08-24 Thread Till Maas
Hi, The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to actively working on fixing them. Here is a status update. There are now more packages than in the recent report, because the packages are now hopefully bett

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-23 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:51:15AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Till Maas wrote: > > > smart athimm, scop > > Where does this information about maintainers come from? Once upon a > time I (scop) was a co-maintainer for this package, but

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-23 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Till Maas wrote: > smart athimm, scop Where does this information about maintainers come from? Once upon a time I (scop) was a co-maintainer for this package, but I believe I've resigned a long time ago, and packagedb doesn't show me associat

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-20 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:05:32PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be > retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to > actively working on fixing them. > > Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain o

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-20 Thread Gustavo Luiz Duarte
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > I admire the determination, but we don't even enable PS3 support in > the Fedora kernels any longer. We haven't for some time, and we won't > be turning it back on. So while users may wish to keep their PS3s > running Linux, it isn't going t

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-20 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Gustavo Luiz Duarte wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Gustavo Luiz Duarte >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Till Maas wrote: >>> petitboot dwmw2,

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-20 Thread Gustavo Luiz Duarte
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Gustavo Luiz Duarte > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Till Maas wrote: >> >> petitboot dwmw2, tbreeds, jwboyer >>> >> >> >> Please don't retire petitboot. I will fix it. I migh

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Gustavo Luiz Duarte wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > petitboot dwmw2, tbreeds, jwboyer >> > > > Please don't retire petitboot. I will fix it. I might also apply for > co-maintainer. > Why? It's for the PS3 which no lo

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-20 Thread Gustavo Luiz Duarte
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Till Maas wrote: petitboot dwmw2, tbreeds, jwboyer > Please don't retire petitboot. I will fix it. I might also apply for co-maintainer. Thanks, Gustavo Luiz Duarte -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-19 Thread Christopher Meng
Hi TIll, The maintainer of package python-pylons is a zombie. I just realized that I'm on CC list but not co. I'd like to take it. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.o

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-19 Thread Christopher Meng
Don't retire my package, I have no time to fix them in this week, will check them at least from next Monday. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-19 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:51:34PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > No they can't, the sync of blocked/new packages is synced over all > secondary arches. They could likely be untagged so they don't show up in > the list. Tagging is also synced, therefore it is more complicated. There is now a tick

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-19 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:21:38PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:05:32 +0200 > > Till Maas wrote: > > > > > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be > > > retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone r

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-19 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:21:38PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:05:32 +0200 > Till Maas wrote: > > > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be > > retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to > > actively working on fixing them

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-19 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:05:32 +0200 Till Maas wrote: > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be > retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to > actively working on fixing them. > > Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of

[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-19 Thread Till Maas
The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to actively working on fixing them. Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one.