On 09/01/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
There's been discussion over the last few releases of moving xine out of
the mainline Fedora release to rpmfusion but I'm not sure what happened
with that.
There's a pending review for xine-lib 1.2 in RPM Fusion. xine-lib will
be retired from Fedor
The following packages are now blocked in F20+ as decided on today's
FESCo meeting:
libgssglue spacewalk-web
Please fix any resulting dependency issues.
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Sunday 01 September 2013 at 20:46:37, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 11:09:41AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > There's been discussion over the last few releases of moving xine out of
> > the mainline Fedora release to rpmfusion but I'm not sure what happened
> > with that.
>
> FY
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 11:09:41AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> There's been discussion over the last few releases of moving xine out of
> the mainline Fedora release to rpmfusion but I'm not sure what happened
> with that.
FYI: I rebuilt xine-libs for now to avoid long-time dependency breakage
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 06:06:16PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 2013/8/29 Till Maas
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > >
> > > > Package(co)maintainers
> > > >
> > >
>
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 06:06:16PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2013/8/29 Till Maas
>
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > > Package(co)maintainers
> > >
> >
2013/8/29 Till Maas
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > Package(co)maintainers
> >
> ===
> > directfb orphan, kwizart
>
> > tslib
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 04:15:15PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Undead and all builds obsoleted:
>
> drupal6-drush
> obsoleted by: php-drush-drush
> jaxen-bootstrap
> obsoleted by: jaxen
> joystick
> obsoleted by: linuxconsoletools
> kdirstat
>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:52:25 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> I guess you won't get responses to packages that are orphaned, because
> then the bug report is assigned to the orphan user.
Only few were orphaned when filing the bugs. I just didn't think about
using the pkgdb API to fetch the list.
> > D
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:09:12AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> And retiring packages is too difficult in Fedora. The process is
> complex or not known by all packagers:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>
> Some retire only in pkgdb (some create orph
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Package(co)maintainers
> ===
> directfb orphan, kwizart
>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:57:18 +0200, 80 wrote:
> By mere curiosity, why didn't we follow the usual renaming process (and
> avoid losing the previous history in git) ?
> It was just an upstream rename due to a trademark issue.
The rename process may have been followed, but the renamed packages have
By mere curiosity, why didn't we follow the usual renaming process (and
avoid losing the previous history in git) ?
It was just an upstream rename due to a trademark issue.
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 07:56:28AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:32:19AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > python-quantumclient orphan, jruzicka, vaneldik, pbrady, apevec,
> > > gkotton,
> > >markmc, rkukura
> > > Depending on: python-quantumclient
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:32:19AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > python-quantumclient orphan, jruzicka, vaneldik, pbrady, apevec, gkotton,
> >markmc, rkukura
> > Depending on: python-quantumclient
> > openstack-quantum (maintained by: rkukura, itamarjp, otherwis
> python-quantumclient orphan, jruzicka, vaneldik, pbrady, apevec, gkotton,
>markmc, rkukura
> Depending on: python-quantumclient
> openstack-quantum (maintained by: rkukura, itamarjp, otherwiseguy,
> mmagr, josecastroleon, vaneldik, pbrady, rackerjoe, apevec, chri
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> The following packages are currently retired but other packages depend
> on them. Since the packages are not yet blocked in koji, this is not
> very visible. Nevertheless, the packages need new maintainers or the
> depending packages need
The following packages are currently retired but other packages depend
on them. Since the packages are not yet blocked in koji, this is not
very visible. Nevertheless, the packages need new maintainers or the
depending packages need to drop dependencies on them.
Remarks:
- There are no recursive d
18 matches
Mail list logo
