On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 06:19:39PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> There hasn't been FTBFS bug reports since Matt stopped doing them due
> to lack of time, the maintainer would have got failed builds for the
> mass rebuild and should have investigated as part of "maintaining" the
> package.
Is thi
Peter Robinson writes:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> If there aren't FTBFS bug reports in the future, that's going to make
>> doing FTBFS-blocking tricky. Did you generate your list merely from
>> "things with older dist tags, so they obviously didn't rebuild", or fr
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> > At least for aircrack-ng from your list no FTBFS bug has been filed,
>> > therefore I do not see any reason to remove it from Fedora. And in case
>> > it really does not build, I expect a bug
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> > At least for aircrack-ng from your list no FTBFS bug has been filed,
> > therefore I do not see any reason to remove it from Fedora. And in case
> > it really does not build, I expect a bug report.
>
> There hasn't been FTBFS bug reports since Matt
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:36:23PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> >> It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (i
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:36:23PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> >> It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (ie
> >> not had a successful build in F-15 or later)
> >
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> dbh-1.0.24-9.fc12
I just took this and am working on the FTBFS
> nightview-0.3.3-2.fc14
Lubo maintains this, I may request ownership if I can fix the FTBFS.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
-
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (ie
>> not had a successful build in F-15 or later)
>
> It's done off the F15FTBFS bug. If these don't have bugs blocking that,
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
> It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (ie
> not had a successful build in F-15 or later)
It's done off the F15FTBFS bug. If these don't have bugs blocking that,
they won't get picked up.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 13:44:34 +,
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> Well I take back some of what I said before. In the new version
> (4.0.1) the cut-and-paste C code for reading and writing images has
> been replaced with use of the appropriate libraries (libpng, libjpeg,
> libungif, free
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 07:17:21AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 13:03:09 +,
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > ocaml-camlimages? I've kicked this package out of Fedora because
> > camlimages has a dead upstream *and* a lengthy history of security
> > bugs. It
Hi Rich,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 05:26:02PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 17:46:45 +,
>> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > freetennis-0.4.8-18.fc12
>>
>> Note that freetennis is waiting on a review of ocaml-cal
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 13:03:09 +,
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> ocaml-camlimages? I've kicked this package out of Fedora because
> camlimages has a dead upstream *and* a lengthy history of security
> bugs. It contains old C code pasted from various places, and really
> shouldn't be us
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 05:26:02PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 17:46:45 +,
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > freetennis-0.4.8-18.fc12
>
> Note that freetennis is waiting on a review of ocaml-calimages. I have tested
> rebuilding freetennis against my local copy of ocam
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 18:21:43 -0600
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 17:46:45 +,
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > leonidas-backgrounds-11.0.0-2.fc12
>
> This one just had an extra newline in the sources file and I have
> started new builds for f17 and f18. I push the f17 build to
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 17:46:45 +,
Peter Robinson wrote:
> leonidas-backgrounds-11.0.0-2.fc12
This one just had an extra newline in the sources file and I have
started new builds for f17 and f18. I push the f17 build to testing
when they are done.
Since this is only a build issue, I don't
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 17:46:45 +,
Peter Robinson wrote:
> freetennis-0.4.8-18.fc12
Note that freetennis is waiting on a review of ocaml-calimages. I have tested
rebuilding freetennis against my local copy of ocaml-calimages and it
worked.
I have traded some package maintenance tasks with
Hi Bill,
It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (ie
not had a successful build in F-15 or later) were suppose to be
retired/blocked as well. The following list are FTBFS from at least
the F-15 mass rebuild and in some cases even the F-12 one but haven't
been blocked and
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 08:44 PM, Andy Grimm wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Bill Nottingham
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> As stated eariler, the following packages have been retired in F-17 (and
>>> therefore rawhide), due to either failing to buil
On 02/06/2012 08:44 PM, Andy Grimm wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
As stated eariler, the following packages have been retired in F-17 (and
therefore rawhide), due to either failing to build, or not having maintainers.
...
junit4
...
Whoa there.. .this one wasn'
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> As stated eariler, the following packages have been retired in F-17 (and
> therefore rawhide), due to either failing to build, or not having maintainers.
>
> ...
> junit4
> ...
Whoa there.. .this one wasn't in any of the previous emails...
As stated eariler, the following packages have been retired in F-17 (and
therefore rawhide), due to either failing to build, or not having maintainers.
adaptx
ario
asa
autodafe
avant-window-navigator
avl
awn-extras-applets
bit
blam
camstream
ccsm
compiz
compiz-bcop
compizconfig-backend-gconf
compi
22 matches
Mail list logo
