On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 13:24:53 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 1:18 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200
> > Sandro wrote:
> >
> > > On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have met a package that uses %autorelease and w
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 1:18 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200
> Sandro wrote:
>
> > On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix
> > > to the release for my local test build that doesn'
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200
Sandro wrote:
> On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix
> > to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be
> > compliant with the official versioning, but just
On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote:
Hi,
I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix
to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be
compliant with the official versioning, but just differentiate interim
builds. It's quite common to append eg. ".rhbz123
Hi,
I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix
to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be
compliant with the official versioning, but just differentiate interim
builds. It's quite common to append eg. ".rhbz123456" or similar
suffices. It looks to me
