>5 PM, poma wrote:
> On 02.01.2014 20:36, Steve Clark wrote:
>
>> Also at least yum stood for something - Yellowdog Updater, Modified - as
>> opposed to being some
>> nonsensical conglomeration of letters. The only thing I am aware of that dnf
>> means is "did not finish".
>
> Did Not Finish
> D
This is the a good paper, old but interesting anyway, on this subject.
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-10/msg00411.html
Best
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 31.03.2013 21:24, schrieb yersinia:
> > However prelink
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 01:09:36AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Dhiru Kholia wrote:
> > > Any feedback is welcome!
> >
> > My proposal: build ALL packages in Fedora with not only -fPIE and RELRO,
> but
> > also -fstack-protector-all (w
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> sysctl -a | grep protected
> fs.protected_hardlinks = 0
> fs.protected_symlinks = 0
>
Here some more info for this apparent regression
http://kernel.opensuse.org/cgit/kernel/commit/?id=561
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:05 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky <
> sochotni...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Quoting Kevin Fenzi (2013-03-12 15:53:56)
>> > On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:49:22 +0100
>> > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> >
>> > > Tomcat6 package in Fe
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I've setup a fedorahosted project:
> https://fedorahosted.org/formulas/wiki/WikiStart
> and mailing list:
> http://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/formulas-devel
> to discuss development of the formulas idea mentioned at
For the folk here that don't follow fd. The author is a well know and
respected security researcher.
Just for info.
Best regards
-- Forwarded message --
From: Georgi Guninski
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:13:58 +0300
Subject: [Full-disclosure] The right to read, debuggers and buildin
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:20 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Bojan Smojver
>> wrote:
>> > Anyone knows what's the holdup with the Samba update (CVE-2012-1182)? No
>> > new builds have been done or queued up recent
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Przemek Klosowski <
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 09:08 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:42:10AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> no, maybe you should read AND try to understand
>>>
>>
>> This kind of behaviour isn't
Greetings
Perhaps it is of interest to this list that Phonorix has produced a new
benchmark about the performance impact of SELinux on
Fedora 15. Look very good
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=fedora_15_selinux&num=2.
Best Regards
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
>
> error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1 cmp C2
> to X cmp C1 +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
>
> These seem to be associated with code
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Tim Niemueller wrote:
> Incidentally, if you'd like to see an updated git for EL-5, point
> anyone you know that uses emacs-git my way. AFAIK, the only hang up
> to updating EPEL to git-1.7 is working out how to maintain the emacs
> suppor
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/12/2010 01:49 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've recently upgraded my system, but after that I was not able to connect
>> through ssh. More things are wrong (from my PO
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> This article:
>
> http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/security_mechanisms_in_linux_environment__part_1___userspace_memory_protection/
>
> seems to say that fedora is ranking poorly in deployment of various
> userspace memory protection mecha
ique
>> > installations via some hash or whatever) and a packagekit extension
>> > that shows the count or something like stars or whatever.
>> >
>> > So, it has to be on by default.
>>
>> I'm sorry if I misunderstood you, but if you talked about
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:25 AM, yersinia
> wrote:
> > Look interesting from a QA point of view.
>
> How exactly is this interesting from a QA pov in Fedora? Smolt
> profiles I can understand being useful for QA bec
Would be interesting to have in Fedora something like this
http://popcon.debian.org/
?
Look interesting from a QA point of view.
Regards
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Davide Bolcioni
wrote:
> On Sunday 02 May 2010 10:52:57 Berry, Randall wrote:
>
>> I have an application I am working on that requires a config file in
>> the users home directory. This file is .asoundrc (alsa sound config) I
>> need to write a script that does 5
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 05:37 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> There is a small bug in the example:
>>
>> Instead of
>>
>> %find_lang %{name}
>> rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/info/dir
>>
>> this should be
>>
>> %find_lang %{name}
>> rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
n Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
> Saw this in today's updates:
>
>
> Cleanup: cyrus-sasl-2.1.23-4.fc12.i686
> 195/254
> groupdel: group 'saslauth' does not exist
>
Already fixed
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I will propose this to FESCo through their normal channels.
> >
>
> -1
>
> It sure looks like a californian referendum process. Let me make this
> abundantly clear: I have ZERO inter
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Alexander Kahl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/11/2010 09:24 AM, yersinia wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Alexander Kahl wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Alexander Kahl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/10/2010 01:06 PM, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> There is no real recovery for traditional package systems as each change
> on a package (install, update, remove etc.) changes the state
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Zoltan Kota writes:
>
> > And for recode.x86_64:
> >
> >
> http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/x86_64/recode-3.6-28.fc12.src.rpm/result/build.log
> >
> > checking host system type... Invalid configuration
> > `
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 08:06 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 8 February 2010 22:46, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > As a result, you'll be causing dozens of FTBFS bugs just before the
> feature
> > > freeze. I think this is entirely the wrong ti
25 matches
Mail list logo