On 6/1/2010 5:45 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Guys, nobody wants to take away configuration options. You can edit the
> .service files too, and readjust things. You can even plug in shell
> scripts here and there and wherever it suits you.
>
> There are not plans to make configuration of systemd
On 5/31/2010 5:08 PM, Casimiro de Almeida Barreto wrote:
Em 31-05-2010 09:33, Andrew Overholt escreveu:
Hi Casimiro,
I've got the following problem with eclipse after update to F13: upon launch it
freezes at initial banner& uses about 80% of CPU time.
Please file a bug at bugzilla.
On 5/4/2010 12:57 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Testing takes time, lets give up? Seriously? Pushes happen about once
> every 24 hours, do you really say it'll take longer than 24 hours to get
> a couple people to test the issue and confirm that your fix does indeed
> fix the issue, and doesn't seem
On 4/25/2010 8:37 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 10:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>
>> I don't see how using Mozilla trademarks provides significant benefit
>> to Fedora. It seems to mostly benefit Mozilla. I don't see why we should
>> be breaking our rules to help them
On 3/18/2010 9:47 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> The default pseudo-geometry will still be 63 sectors/track unless you
> change it, and by default a partition's start-of-data is forced to the
> beginning of a track. Making the sectors larger doesn't change that.
>
Warning: this question is asked
On 3/6/2010 9:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I thought to myself yesterday, 'what this long and fractious thread
> about update policy *really* needs is some unscientific and
> controversial numbers'. =) So, I ran a forum poll! Everyone loves those,
> right?
>
>
> What do people make of this?
>
On 3/4/2010 5:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:54:28AM -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>> M A Young wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know if this has already been raised but I notice on the
>>> package-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org list that several Fedora 13
>>> packages keep get
On 3/1/2010 10:44 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> One problem of updates-testing is - it takes so much time to be pushed and
> then mirrored. More rawhide approach should be used here. Users who are really
> interested in testing usually downloads from Koji directly.
>
It is not so simple. When I
On 1/29/2010 4:50 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 09:32 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
>
>> What is considered the best practice for packaging a program that uses
>> strlcpy()?
>>
> Besides patching it to not use strlcpy? :)
>
Is there a reason (from a programming point of view)
