Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

2010-03-11 Thread psmith
On 11/03/10 22:45, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Chris Adams wrote: > > >> Once upon a time, Paul Wouters said: >> >>> That might be harsh for some soname updates. Six months is a long time >>> to wait on new functionality after upstream released it. >>> >> People keep tossing out "six m

Re: PROPOSAL: Fedora user survey

2010-03-11 Thread psmith
On 09/03/10 05:05, Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Jon Masters wrote: > > >> Folks, >> >> I will propose this to FESCo through their normal channels. >> >> My proposal is that we create a "Fedora User Survey" and create a link >> on the fp.o website with a few very simple questions. O

Re: To semi-rolling or not to semi-rolling, that is the question...

2010-03-11 Thread psmith
On 09/03/10 19:06, Doug Ledford wrote: > On 03/09/2010 11:45 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Jesse Keating wrote: >> >>> Slight variation on this. All builds from devel/ (or master in the new >>> git world) would go to the koji tag dist-rawhide-candidate. Builds >>> which are tagged with d

Re: Update question: some user data

2010-03-07 Thread psmith
On 06/03/10 20:14, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 03/07/2010 01:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: If that were the case, I'd have expected someone to bring it up in the comments. No-one has. I've never actually heard of anyone running FN-1 because they want a 'more stable' system; this thread was the