Updating Brotli to 1.0.5 in Rawhide

Since nobody complained, I decided to push the update. if you need to rebuild anything that depends on it, you might need to do so -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links

Re: Plan to update Brotli to 1.0.5 in Rawhide

god no, stop!' Maybe just say 'hey, I'm going to go ahead and do this > on date X if no-one complains', then do it on that date, and send out > another mail asking folks to do rebuilds. So that's a yes, I can update it? -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID:

Re: Plan to update Brotli to 1.0.5 in Rawhide

ump" thing -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links: https://www.pouar.net/social.php pgpPObX7r5dl_.pgp Description: OpenPGP di

Re: Plan to update Brotli to 1.0.5 in Rawhide

I've been using this https://lvc.github.io/abi-compliance-checker which relies on this https://github.com/lvc/abi-dumper and it's the latter that stopped working and the former doesn't work without it -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.

Plan to update Brotli to 1.0.5 in Rawhide

> php-pecl-http > webkit2gtk3 > woff2 > > But I'm supposed to coordinate with the maintainers of these packages and check to see if they work with the new release, probably a week in advance golang-github-dsnet-compress httpd php-pecl-http python

Question about a package I might update

Brotli 1.0.5 is out and I might update it in Rawhide, but the tool I used to check ABI differences seems to have stopped working on both Arch and Fedora. So I'm not sure if Brolti included any ABI/API breaking changes. Should I push an update anyway? -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar T

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

after I read this email, though I didn't say anything until now as I didn't think to respond to this until now -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links: https

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

the soname the reverse deps link to doesn't seemed to have changed as they all link to the .so.1 soname, but I'm not sure how to check for "weirdness" in these packages -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links: https://www.pouar.net/social.php pgp4xkcY6vjnH.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature _

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

g > anything else. Well the minor version and the soname of the library itself changed but the major version and the sonames of the symlinks pointing to the library remained the same. Also 2 fields in BrotliDistanceParams changed positions, but I'm not sure whether this is exposed to other pa

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

So is someone else is going to do the checking if the reverse dependencies work with the new version or do I have to do that? -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links

Re: plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

intainers > of the above packages. Please do test rebuilds in COPR if you haven't > already and try to fix any issues before actually doing the update. > > Regards, > Dominik Is there documentation or a wiki page on how to do that? This is my first time going through this proc

plan to update brotli to 1.0.4 in Rawhide

the day I update it right? -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links: https://www.pouar.net/social.php BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:4.0 CLASS:public N:Dragon;Pouar;;; X-EVOLUTION-FIL

Re: How should I coordinate the package updates with you guys?

and email those maintainers as well or just list the immediate whatrequires and just email those guys? -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links: https://www.pouar.net/social

Re: How should I coordinate the package updates with you guys?

en on the same day as the build of brotli. > > Note this is all assuming the new version will actually change the > soname - if it doesn't, there's no problem. The current soname in > Rawhide is 'libbrotli(whatever).so.1', if that's the same with the new > ve

Re: How should I coordinate the package updates with you guys?

there a different command that I should run? Do I just make an announcement after uploading with the list of packages that need to rebuild or is there something else that I need to do first? -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5E

How should I coordinate the package updates with you guys?

Brotli apparently just got a new update, and I was told I have to coordinate package updates with you guys in Rawhide instead of just uploading the updates unannounced. How should I proceed? -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): brotli (libbrotli{common,enc,dec}.so.1.0.1 -> libbrotli{common,enc,dec}.so.1)

n, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate > rebuilds. Didn't know I was supposed to. Sorry about that. I'll try and remember to do so next time. -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6

Re: Question about contributing

-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org So it's optional? -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links: https://www.pouar.net/social.php pgpBBx5wpM957.pgp Description: OpenPGP digit

Re: Well, here's my first package

ended best practice. Feel free to do it in any way you see fit. Wish I read this before making the review request -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links: htt

Well, here's my first package

Link to package review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448661 Any comments? Any suggestions on how to tell upstream as I'm not really good at talking to people. -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9F

Question about contributing

this first before creating a review request for the package or wait until the package is approved? -- GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar Tox ID: 2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A299272F29D9FF5F6A Matrix ID: @Pouar:matrix.org Social Links: https://www.pouar.net/

Re: Self Introduction: Travis Kendrick

Seems I sent this from Gmail by accident, although you could probably tell that already -- Travis Kendrick On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 11:44 -0500, Pouar wrote: > Well I could probably package almost anything as long as I understand > it. On my Arch system I have a few custom packages. Some o

Re: Self Introduction: Travis Kendrick

03-27 at 14:28 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:47:08AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Hello and welcome! > >  > >  > > Dne 24.3.2017 v 18:10 Pouar napsal(a): > > > Hi, I'm Travis (aka Pouar in the Furry Fandom) and I

Self Introduction: Travis Kendrick

Hi, I'm Travis (aka Pouar in the Furry Fandom) and I'm hoping to become a package co-maintainer (assuming there are any packages needing one, not sure where to find them so I might need help). If not there are a few packages I could probably submit, but I'm not exactly available

Re: vmpk 0.6.0 license changed to 'GPLv3+'

Good On 10/19/2014 09:45 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > vmpk 0.6.0 license changed from 'GPLv3+ and (LGPLv2 with exception or > GPLv3)' to 'GPLv3+'. > > Cheers > -robin > > -- Pouar -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje