I will thank you to be more polite. It is
clear there is no simple answer or easy solution.
My point was to be practical and attempt to get from base 1 to base 2 with the
aim of getting to base 4 down the road...
Is this not a sensible way forward?
Phantomjinx--
devel mailing list
devel@
r workings of the project so please bear that
in mind when replying.
Phantomjinx--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/01/2012 12:58 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 09:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Chris Adams wrote:
>>> - Secure boot is required to be able to be disabled on x86 (the only
>>> platform Fedora will support it).
>> And this is exactly why we should just require our users to disable it!
>>
o the initramfs' to avoid the breakages please? Is this
possible? Would uniting the partitions be the only possibility?
This is intended as pragmatic questions since I am at this moment quite
neutral/ignorant on the finer points of this discussion.
Thanks
phantomjinx
--
devel mailing
quired to be shared. Doing so retains a linear history on the branch and can
mean the branch commits can end up being fast forwarded onto master when the
feature is complete.
My 2p
Cheers
Phantomjinx
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.--
devel mailing list
es section:
>
> %(_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas/org.gtkpod.gschema.xml
>^
> (!)
>
> Could be that this hides the subpackage %files section somehow.
Yes... that would be the problem.
My thanks to you sir. Much appreciated.
phantomjinx
--
"I know exactly who reads th
ne.
Likewise, rpmlint seems to have no problems with it.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
phantomjinx
--
"I know exactly who reads the papers ...
The Daily Mirror is read by people who think they run the country.
The Guardian is read by people who think they ought to run
On 29/03/11 17:42, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> phantomjinx wrote:
>
>> Since I uploaded gtkpod version 2 to sourceforge, I thought it would be
>> helpful if I made available my unstable build version of the gtkpod spec
>> file to the fedora package maintainers. Anyway, please
myself but
I am relatively new to rpm building so it would take a while.
Cheers
phantomjinx
Name: gtkpod
Version:%{REVISION}
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Graphical song management program for Apple's iPod
Group: Applications/Multimedia
# The
