libgit2 1.9.x in rawhide with a compat package for 1.8.x

let me know. With the compat package system this is now doable.  Pete -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en

Re: HEADS UP: icu 76 coming to rawhide

06.12.2024, 21:55, "Frantisek Zatloukal" :Hey, I'll handle mozjsXYZ changes for it :) That's great. Thanks a lot for the help! Pete -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

HEADS UP: icu 76 coming to rawhide

ork on the rebuilds over the weekend / next week.Have a good day!Pete -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pr

HEADS UP: libvpx soname bump in rawhide

-qtwebengine-5.15.16-1.fc40.src.rpmseamonkey-2.53.18.1-2.fc40.src.rpmtoxcore-0.2.18-6.fc40.src.rpmutox-0.18.1-11.fc40.src.rpmvlc-3.0.20-11.fc40.src.rpmxine-lib-1.2.13-10.fc40.src.rpmxpra-5.0.3-4.fc40.src.rpm Have a good day!Pete-- ___ devel mailing list -- devel

HEADS UP: icu 74 coming to rawhide

ork on the rebuilds over the weekend.Have a good day!Pete-- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-

Re: process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

28.08.2023, 20:08, "Fabio Valentini" :On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 7:53 PM Pete Walter <walter.p...@yandex.com> wrote: 28.08.2023, 18:34, "Scott Talbert" <s...@techie.net>: On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Mark E. Fuller wrote:  Hi all,  I'm trying to unretire golang-github-g

Re: process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

28.08.2023, 18:34, "Scott Talbert" :On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Mark E. Fuller wrote:  Hi all, I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have completed a re-review. However, since the package still exists in F37 and F38, the process for getting the F39 and rawhide branches "back" and gett

libgit2 1.7.x in rawhide and F39 with a compat packages for 1.6.x and 1.5.x

I just bumped libgit2 to 1.7.x in both rawhide and F39 and added a compat package for the old 1.6.x ABI. This should allow seamless switchover to the new ABI without breaking anything that needs 1.6.x. We also have an older compat package for 1.5.x ABI that is still used by the golang bindings. The

libgit2 1.6.x in rawhide and F38 with a compat package for 1.5.x

I just bumped libgit2 to 1.6.x in both rawhide and F38 and added a compat package for the old 1.5.x ABI. This should allow seamless switchover to the new ABI without breaking anything that needs 1.5.x. Let me know if you run into issues with this. The compat package system for libgit2 is still new

libgit2 1.5.x in rawhide with compat packages for 1.3.x and 1.4.x

I took over libgit2 from Igor when he gave up all his packages and have since tried to get it up to date. libgit2 is a bit special because it bumps soname every once in a while and then other packages often fail to rebuild against the new version both because of libgit2 API changes and because they

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired next week

- all   31.01.2023, 12:44, "Miro Hrončok" :howl atim, pwalterI took over howl that was orphaned a few weeks ago and now rescued it and fixed it to build from source. I also created a fedora flatpak for it as it was missing. Pete___ devel mailing list -- d

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

I am not happy about dropping Fedora packages in favor of upstream Flatpaks either. Can you assign the package to me instead of retiring it? I can get it updated so we can keep it in Fedora. Pete 25.01.2023, 10:56, "Vít Ondruch" :I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about

Re: HEADS UP: icu 72 coming to rawhide

28.12.2022, 15:09, "Pete Walter" :Hi,I am in the process of updating icu from 71.1 to 72.1 in rawhide. This comes with a soname bump, but as usual, I'm including a compat package providing the old soname to not break the world while the rebuilds are in progress, so no rawhide break

HEADS UP: icu 72 coming to rawhide

Hi,I am in the process of updating icu from 71.1 to 72.1 in rawhide. This comes with a soname bump, but as usual, I'm including a compat package providing the old soname to not break the world while the rebuilds are in progress, so no rawhide breakage is expected. I'll work on the rebuilds over the

Re: Self Introduction: Peter Savage

It was a long time ago - but thank you for the welcome :) On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 7:56 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > On Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 15:31, Pete Savage wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I was a MOTU for Ubu

Self Introduction: Peter Savage

Hi all, I was a MOTU for Ubuntu in the past, recently I've become interested in composing music and there are a number of packages that I'd like to see in Fedora's main repo. I'm tacklingthe sFizz package first, hoping you'll see a package for r

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libgdal.so.28

22.05.2021, 10:43, "Sandro Mani" : On 21.05.21 14:24, Sandro Mani wrote: On 21.05.21 14:03, Richard Shaw wrote:On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:43 AM Pete Walter <walter.p...@yandex.com> wrote:libgdal soname has been bumped to libgdal.so.28 without rebuilding dependent packages in rawh

Unannounced soname bump: libgdal.so.28

libgdal soname has been bumped to libgdal.so.28 without rebuilding dependent packages in rawhide. From what I can tell the rebuilds were actually in progress but then due to the soname bump in libgta (discussed in another thread on devel@) the libgdal update leaked out to rawhide in https://koji.fe

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

  19.05.2021, 23:37, "Adam Williamson" :On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 15:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:  2. How can we best sensibly tweak things so we don't gate on Rawhide updates that *do* get marked as critpath?  I'm going to think about #2 now.So all the clever ways I can think of to do this for now

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

  19.05.2021, 22:59, "Adam Williamson" :On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 22:54 +0100, Pete Walter wrote: I waited over an hour on openQA test results that never came. Ended up waiving https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8cdffadc43. After a bunch of searching I f

Re: Bodhi critpath package updates now gated on openQA results

I waited over an hour on openQA test results that never came. Ended up waiving https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8cdffadc43. After a bunch of searching I found https://openqa.fedoraproject.org but there was no indication that it had even started running the tests for this update. 

HEADS UP: icu 69 coming to rawhide

Hi,I am in the process of updating icu from 67.1 to 69.1 in rawhide. This comes with a soname bump, but as usual, I'm including a compat package providing the old soname to not break the world while the rebuilds are in progress, so no rawhide breakage is expected. I'll work on the rebuilds over the

HEADS UP: icu 67 coming to rawhide

Hi,I am in the process of updating icu from 65.1 to 67.1 in rawhide. This comes with a soname bump, but as usual, I'm including a compat package providing the old soname to not break the world while the rebuilds are in progress, so no rawhide breakage is expected. I'll work on the rebuilds over the

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

21.03.2020, 10:15, "Neal Gompa" : > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote: >>  For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I >> am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment. > > In that case, I'd be happy

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

Sure, I've bumped the access level and please go ahead. Thanks for asking nicely (instead of demanding like Neal Gompa did ...). Pete 21.03.2020, 15:20, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" : > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:02:18AM +, Pete Walter wrote: >>  For months!? This is the fi

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pwalter

For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment. Pete 21.03.2020, 08:41, "Neal Gompa" : > Hello all, > > I've been trying to get in touch with Pete Walter for a few months now

Orphaning percona-xtrabackup package

Hi everybody, I'm orphaning the percona-xtrabackup package. It's fallen behind the upstream and doesn't build in F32. I no longer need the package for work (the Trove OpenStack project) and don't have the time to maintain it any longer. \Pete -- Pete MacKinnon Principal S

Last chance to vote for FESCo

Go vote now before the vote closes! Otherwise you'll miss this crucial chance to choose whether Fedora should support modularity or not. https://elections.fedoraproject.org/ Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

s and containers and special-purpose machines. > > I would support this change if there were plausible scenarios where the > password is unset by mistake. But the only case cited so far is the puppet > mistake where the admins scripted 'passwd -d root' and then forgot a

HEADS UP: icu 65 just landed in rawhide

he weekend. Have a good weekend! Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

ile > on. Well said. I have also stayed quiet for much the same reasons, but I support what Kevin and Miro and others are saying. It's definitely just not 4 noisy individuals. I'd even go as far as saying that most of the community here agrees with what they are saying. Pete __

Re: Major update to LLVM appearing in F31 without any communication, appears to violate update policy

I'll submit mesa to stable after you've submitted llvm so they end up going out at the same time. Thanks, Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org F

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

a clear story as well what to expect). Also, I'd like you to stop shipping the python bindings inside the libgit2 module. They are working very well as a regular package. Thanks. The parallel installable libgit2 non-modular packages that were proposed earlier sounds like a nice solution. I&#

Re: pwalter pushed to ImageMagick (master). "Update to 6.9.10.28"

18.02.2019, 16:36, "Michael Cronenworth" : > On 2/18/19 10:07 AM, notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote: >>  Notification time stamped 2019-02-18 16:07:12 UTC >> >>   From b21c11f55efa073c3d6c4798980bf8821131a872 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>  From: Pete Walter

Re: Attempting to fix hyperscan FTBFS

12.02.2019, 21:16, "jt" : > On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 16:13 -0500, jt wrote: >>  On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 21:06 +, Pete Walter wrote: >>  > Looking at the build log, it seems to be checking for 'libpcre = >>  > 8.41', but the build root has 8.4

Re: Attempting to fix hyperscan FTBFS

12.02.2019, 21:16, "jt" : > On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 16:13 -0500, jt wrote: >>  On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 21:06 +, Pete Walter wrote: >>  > Looking at the build log, it seems to be checking for 'libpcre = >>  > 8.41', but the build root has 8.4

Re: Attempting to fix hyperscan FTBFS

Looking at the build log, it seems to be checking for 'libpcre = 8.41', but the build root has 8.43-RC1 which causes the build to error out. Pete 12.02.2019, 20:43, "jt" : > Hi All, > > I am looking at the FTBFS for hyperscan[0] and need some assistance. > Fr

Re: Fedora 30 Mass Rebuild

There seems to be an issue with moving builds over. Everything seems to be stuck in f30-pending and not getting tagged with f30. I'm also concerned that once the signing queue starts moving, it's going to tag older packages over the new builds that have happened in the mean time. Pete  

Re: Unannounced soname bump - libwmf-0.2.so.7 -> libwmf-0.2.so.8

02.02.2019, 15:54, "Rex Dieter" : > Rolling back is still probably the "right thing to do(tm)" Completely agree. Thanks for fixing it, Caolán! Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe se

Re: Can't figure out how to build flatpaks

01.02.2019, 04:06, "Owen Taylor" : > Thanks for trying it out, and sorry that you are having problems! Thanks Owen! That was super helpful. Got it to build now and submitted the update to bodhi: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2019-a92

Can't figure out how to build flatpaks

thing to modules/flatpak, but that fails again with the familiar missing buildrequires error: $ fedpkg module-build Submitting the module build... Could not execute module_build: The build failed with: None of the base module (platform or bootstrap) streams in the buildrequires section cou

libicu 63 update with soname bump in rawhide/F30

continue using the compat package. Thanks, Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Gu

Re: Heads Up: libmodulemd 2.0 coming soon to a Rawhide near you

11.12.2018, 10:29, "Fabio Valentini" : > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:05 AM Pete Walter wrote: >>  Huh, better to conflict? That's just not true. Conflicting packages are a >> major hurdle that we should try to avoid if at all possible. If it's still >&g

Re: Heads Up: libmodulemd 2.0 coming soon to a Rawhide near you

ake an argument that it is different there because gtk has longer lifetime than libmodulemd, but it still makes sense to do things right if we can and not make packages unnecessarily conflict. It's just good design that way. Pete ___ devel mailing

HEADS UP: xml-security-c 2.0 in rawhide

Hi, I've updated xml-security-c from 1.7.3 to 2.0.2 in rawhide. This includes a soname bump. I'm going to start rebuilds for affected packages shortly: libdigidocpp opensaml xmltooling Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: libicu 62 update with soname bump in rawhide/F29

09.07.2018, 20:34, "Pete Walter" : > Hi, > > I'm updating icu to 62.1 in rawhide and rebuilding anything that links with > libicu. We'll also have a compat package with libicu 61 soname, so I don't > expect much rawhide breakage: anything that is curren

libicu 62 update with soname bump in rawhide/F29

continue using the compat package. Thanks, Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Gu

Re: libicu upgrade to 61.1 with soname bump in rawhide/F29

01.05.2018, 19:05, "Jonathan Wakely" : > On 26/04/18 19:49 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm upgrading libicu to 61.1 for rawhide, which as usual comes with >> a soname bump. I requested a side target f29-icu for the builds, I'll >>

Re: ​ICU 60.1 coming to rawhide​/F28

14.12.2017, 12:07, "Eike Rathke" : > Hi Pete, > > On Friday, 2017-12-01 17:29:00 +, Pete Walter wrote: > >>  Here's a quick update: icu 60.1 is now built and the rebuilds are all done >> and releng just tagged all the builds over from the f28-i

Re: ​ICU 60.1 coming to rawhide​/F28

c27.src.rpm qt5-qtwebengine-5.9.3-1.fc28.src.rpm soletta-1-1.fc26.src.rpm v8-314-3.14.5.10-7.fc27.src.rpm Cheers, Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: ​ICU 60.1 coming to rawhide​/F28

me. Otherwise composes fall over if one package fails to rebuild etc and QA comes after us with pitchforks. > Let's do builds on a side tag, unless you have a better plan? Sure, good idea. I have now requested the side tag here: https://pagure.io/re

​ICU 60.1 coming to rawhide​/F28

be coordinating rebuilds through my provenpackager powers. Thanks, Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC: retiring yum

very valuable for my use case. -- Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

fedpkg says "fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated."

bodhi.client.bindings instead. DeprecationWarning) All the packages are up to date... or so I think (fedpkg-1.28-1.fc25.noarch, python-fedora-0.9.0-3.fc25.noarch). Is there something I need to steal from Rawhide or what? -- Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Re: F25 builds a library with AVX, causes SIGILL on AMD

f liberasurecode, the library itself is by definition is a switcher shim. Those that want performance specify the fastest Galois Field implementation and liberasurecode then uses -ldl. The fastsest known module for Intel CPUs is their in-house ISA-L library. -- Pete

Re: F25 builds a library with AVX, causes SIGILL on AMD

On Mon, 22 May 2017 23:00:14 -0600 Pete Zaitcev wrote: > As much as I can tell, there's nothing custom in CFLAGS in Makefile.am, > everything is inherited from RPM somehow. Here's how the actual line > looks like in Koji logs: Hate to reply to myself, but I'm an idiot

F25 builds a library with AVX, causes SIGILL on AMD

-DINTEL_SSSE3 -msse4.1 -DINTEL_SSE41 -msse4.2 -DINTEL_SSE42 -mavx -DINTEL_AVX -DARCH_64 -c erasurecode.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/liberasurecode_la-erasurecode.o So, what now? I have no clue where to start fixing this. Thanks in advance for any suggestions, -- Pete _

Re: OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+

... I've never done that before, any pointers to how I can make that happen? -- kind regards, David Sommerseth File a PR or issue at https://pagure.io/release-notes and I'll follow up on it. An issue would be best at the moment, there's a bit of prep work to do for the F26 branch. -- Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Reminder: upcoming retirement of webkitgtk and webkitgtk3 packages

jiben). My intention is to keep maintaining the webkitgtk3 package until bijiben gets ported to something else. I took ownership in pkgdb, but it appears to be still blocked in koji. Does anyone know how I can get it unblocked? Pete 14.03.2017, 19:29, "Michael Catanzaro" : > On Mon, 20

Re: Packages FTBFS with Python 3.6

On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:18:47 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: > I've attached the list of failed packages (failed.txt). You can search python-ceilometerclient python-keystoneclient python-manilaclient python-swiftclient These are victims of python-oslo-sphinx, needs a new release: https://bugzilla.r

Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

boot this way. It would be more important for RHEL users than Fedora users, I assume. --Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: upstream dev. asks suggestions about howto make packagers work easier (bundled libraries, etc.)

doing a lot more manual work when updating foobar because upstream's declared requirements simply are not useful in a distribution packaging context. -- Pete ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: /sbin/nologin in /etc/shells

and rote verification of a checklist, and the list does often address /etc/shells. IMO disruption of those expectations does warrant a Change proposal. > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=53963#c0 > [2] https://lists.fedoraprojec

Re: Self Introduction: Guido Aulisi

Welcome, also come see us in #lad #opensourcemusicians on freenode irc On Sep 7, 2016 2:58 AM, "Giovanni" wrote: > Welcome :) > > -- > 010 Giovanni [dacav] Simoni > 001 > 111 > OpenPGP key: 93FC 2A6A 43A4 AAC2 0D8E 5411 2F99 ABB6 BA14 DF9E > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedorapro

Re: check-buildroot blows up with a Go binary

can't deal with this binary. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

check-buildroot blows up with a Go binary

packaged files found. But this case is different, as above. Does anyone have any guesses about what's going on? Thanks in advance, -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Looking for spec A producing package B

created. Thanks a lot, I was able to update the spec. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Looking for spec A producing package B

trying to get rid of openstack-swift, and it's failing. I guess I'd be okay with an explanation why it's not allowed and why I have to leave a stub RPM with the same name as the spec/SRPM. But it would be the best if someone has an example that I can steal. -- Pete -- devel mai

Re: Re-review to unretire package: python-nikola

review request? > > > > A review swap is welcome. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > José Abílio > > -- > > > > -- > -Igor Gnatenko > -- Hey Jose, I saw your other mail about this but procrastinated responding. Thanks for resurrecting t

Re: Packages seeking new Point Of Contact

uses cairo for > drawing ( master f24 f23 f22 ) > rpms/pygoocanvas -- GooCanvas python bindings ( master f24 f23 f22 ) I picked these 4 up, co-maintainers welcome. Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning blueman

picked it up so it doesn't get retired at least. Pete-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Preparing a new release of Fedora Developer Portal - asking for feedback

This might also be interesting for Docs people. --Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [HEADS UP] libgit2 bump to 0.24.0

20.03.2016, 10:49, "Igor Gnatenko" :I'm updating libgit2 stack to 0.24.0 in rawhide. Can you do it in F24 as well, please? Thanks-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: 3D printing SIG

ts for some time, and would definitely be interested in the results from a SIG, thanks Miro! Probably not much time to contribute beyond documentation I'm already doing, but that could be improved with some guidance. --Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora

> docs and marketing teams directly. > > josh > -- FWIW, to get attention for a new package in the release notes process, you can simply set the review ticket's fedora_requires_release_notes flag to ?. --Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - lnovich ooprala and vjancik

new address. Will follow up if > > > I get a response. > > > > Laura says she has no time to work on Fedora packaging. The packages > > can be orphaned. I'll see if I can get our new documentation manager > > to pick them up. > > ok. Note that t

Re: Orphaning Arduino

thanks Simo On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On 15/11/15 14:27, Pete V wrote: > >> Ok I will :) >> >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Peter Oliver < >> lists.fedoraproject@mavit.org.uk> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015,

Review Swap

Hello, anyone interested in doing a package review swap? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276901 cheers PeteV aka (irc: brainspoil) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject

Re: Orphaning Arduino

Ok I will :) On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Peter Oliver < lists.fedoraproject@mavit.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Pete V wrote: > > very new to this packaging thing but I do use Arduino myselfI'll be glad to >> take it on :) >> > > Great!

Re: Orphaning Arduino

very new to this packaging thing but I do use Arduino myself I'll be glad to take it on :) On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Peter Oliver < lists.fedoraproject@mavit.org.uk> wrote: > I'm afraid I don't have the time to dedicate to Arduino that it deserves, > not using it myself, so I'm going t

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

07.11.2015, 12:19, "Germano Massullo" : > [10:11] Germano: also feel free to refer those guys here to > us if they have questions. seems to me that some direct contact may be > better. What those guys? The only one who wants to kill off darktable is you, Germano. You almost succeeded last time

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

06.11.2015, 22:11, "Germano Massullo" :For example, SSE3 instructions set is one of the minimum requirements and 99% of 32 bit only CPUs do not support it. Only Pentium 4 >= Prescott architecture supports it. Prescott is 11 years old. I would expect vast majority of people who are currently running

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

06.11.2015, 17:18, "Germano Massullo" : > I just removed 32bit CPU support from Darktable's spec file due > technical reasons. It is hard to help if you just say "due to technical reasons". What are they? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

Re: Urgent F23 testing request: logout bugs

23_TC11/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-KDE-x86_64-23-TC11.iso > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > > > -- I have a laptop with missing mouse cursor issues on va

Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux

are not applicable in the broader sense. That's rather complicated stuff, and PlayOnLinux solves the problem by defining those versions and patches and bundling them up for the user. The greater feasibility question IMO is whether it is even possible for PlayOnLinux to be effective when using

Re: ansible in Fedora 23+ (python3)

omeone confirm that at least the dnf module works out of the box? -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Short intro & request for orphaned package adoption

Thank you kindly, sir! I will study these texts with great tenacity. On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Pete V wrote: > > Hi all my name is Pete V. > > As a long time Linux user

Short intro & request for orphaned package adoption

Hi all my name is Pete V. As a long time Linux user, I feel the time has come to step up and contribute big time. Since Fedora core was officially my first distribution I really liked, Fedora would be my chosen target to do this for.(nostalgia):) As of my limited understanding

Re: Orphaned packages available for new point of contact

nterest in this when we did the 1.x -> 2.x rollover last release; I meant to dig up references for a reply but the conversation for ahead. --Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Copr for FeedReader

04.09.2015, 21:18, "Jan Lukas" :Okay, here it is: https://launchpad.net/feedreader/1.2/1.2.1/+download/FeedReader-1.2.1.tar.gzNow with license and build-time-switch for webkit2gtk so you don't have to replace 3.0 with 4.0 in the CMakeLists.txt anymore (use -DUSE_WEBKIT_4=ON) Already updated :) Than

Re: Copr for FeedReader

04.09.2015, 14:19, "Jan Lukas" :Already done. I will release something like a 1.2.1 soon (with the license), since I received a few bug reports after the release :) Thanks. I see you've now released 1.2.1, so I went ahead and updated my spec file as well in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Release Notes: Wiki Freeze Looming

a big help. If you'd like to propose content for after the freeze, reach out to d...@lists.fedoraproject.org or #fedora-docs. -- Pete Travis Fedora Docs Project Lead [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Documentation_beats -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Copr for FeedReader

03.09.2015, 12:57, "Miroslav Suchý" : > Dne 3.9.2015 v 00:16 janlukasgern...@freenet.de napsal(a): >>  repo is now available here. > > I assume this one: > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jeanluc/FeedReader/ > :) > > It looks good. Although the spec from

Re: Copr for FeedReader

t in Fedora proper, but I am not a packager yet and would need a sponsor. Cheers, Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

create-tx-configuration retirement

I am re-retiring create-tx-configuration. I kept it around after Sparks retired it in case we needed it for the transition away from transifex, and that's done, and we didn't. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

f you've already done that. Part of the problem is that activity on both sides is not easily discoverable, so you might have to help sponsors discover your efforts. That's not begging for special attention, only participating in the process.) --Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists

Re: Validity of i686 as a release blocker

ingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 > http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ > The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com > -- > Perhaps the best approach, from a community perspective, would be to promo

[Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Release Notes are Open!

; If you want to participate to that degree, great! If not, don't be dissuaded. It's a huge help to have leads and requests thrown into the funnel, there are writers waiting to take it the rest of the way. -- -- Pete Travis - Fedora Docs Project Leader - &#

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: Netizen Spin

and feel in order to replace the current > > default theme. This is an isolated change. > > * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change) > > * Release engineering: Add spin to spin-kickstarts, ensure spin has been > > tested, and release with rest of spins > >

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

On Apr 13, 2015 5:07 AM, "Radek Holy" wrote: > > > ____ >> >> From: "Pete Travis" >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> >> Sent: Friday, Ap

  1   2   3   >