Hi!
Sorry., I had missed your email. Lets continue the discussion in the ticket
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2449 you had risen.
In the mass rebuilds, I was working with packages with selected java
dependencies or packaes I know about tat had to be included. dogtag pki have
likely only transi
Sure!
TYVM!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedorap
Hi Miro!
The build is in f32 chroot, because jdk8 in rawhide segfaults due to new glibc.
The glibc update had overlap with the initiation of this effort, so I stuck on
f32 for now. It may happen that once we fix jdk8, I will fix also the copr.
Also you could notice, that both rawhide and f32 are
Hi Miro!
The build is in f32 chroot, because jdk8 in rawhide segfaults due to new glibc.
The glibc update had overlap with the initiation of this effort, so I stuck on
f32 for now. It may happen that once we fix jdk8, I will fix also the copr.
Also you could notice, that both rawhide and f32 are
Hi Alex, both your packages
"BuildRequires:java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel"
So I could not pull it. According to the packaging guidelines you should
require only "java-devel" (exactly for this case:)). Thus I could not found
your packages by using build-requires queries. Even If I found, It wou
